MicrostockGroup

So I wonder how long it will take them to cut commissions again. And then suggest that you can use this to increase prices to make the same money as before.

I'm with you, Lisa.  I'm too gun shy to even give this a try.  this announcement didn't even get my heart started.  I just keep thinking "great, another reason to piss off buyers"

If IS was a "normal" site, I would opt in my best sellers immediately, just like I set all files on Fotolia at higher possible price, with no negative effects.

But at IS I am scared of touching my best sellers for now: there MUST be a catch sometime, somewhere.

I'm tempted to add some of my non sellers to the Photo+ collection, just to see what will happen:
nothing to lose, my "worst" files sold at an higher price point, and - just in case they will boost search results a bit - at the top of their search, funny!

On the first post, spazerd says the royalties will stay the same
http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=328522&page=1

I think this will have a different price consequence than Exclusive+ because the pricing will just be the same as most of their entire collection.  It isn't really another 'tier' it is just more images at the exclusive tier pricing.  Of course, the real determining factor is going to be the best match placement.

I will opt in. It cannot get much worse at iS anyway. And just think about it. If files cost too much at iS buyers are slowely migrating to the other microstock agencies. It is the perfect deal for non- exclusives :-)

I'll give it try with a few files (some best sellers, and some non-sellers).
Will see if it's better or worse. My total sales from IS dropped so much that the risk isn't high, even if I ruin some of my best sellers.

Like with E+, it's really up to the contributor.  As for reports of falling sales, many exclusives have also said that their E+ files have worked very well for them, and the ones I have opted in seem to work well for me.  I think it's important to be very selective though;  don't opt a good seller in unless it is either (a) Unique in some way and/or (b) has performed well against similar files.  But that's just my strategy.

As for the 6 month lock in, if you're not comfortable with it, don't opt in;  my assumption though is that the lock in is so that buyers don't find the same files changing price all the time from day to day, which seems reasonable.

I doubt there will be any benefit coming in best match placement.  It has been asked for with E+ but there is no real indication of it being implemented, though of course that could change.

As already said, you'll get the same royalty percentage, but on the higher price, so more $$s.

As for the PP, assuming it's just like E+, it's up to you whether or not you opt a file into the PP as well as making it Photo+.  But you won't get any extra royalty from the PP sales, that stays the same.

My best sellers already kind of stopped selling. My income at iStockphoto has fallen so much dollarwise it cannot fall the same amount again. If it would , I would have to pay iStockphoto each month. Thats why I think what ever, give it a try, not much to loose anyway.

Yes they have been lining their pockets and that is also the point of this. But this time they are incidentally willing to line ours a bit, too. I reckon it amounts to about a 50% pay hike, minus any defections of buyers going to other iStock independents instead of buying our files. If 20% of buyers switch, that would still leave me 20% better off. (80% the number of sales at 150% of the price). The loss of sales would need to hit 33% before it would be quits.

If there is any rationality in iStock, they are doing this because they realise that our files are now underpriced and that we will not hit significant customer resistance by putting them at a price that equals that of the exclusive collection. Istock also has an incentive - whether it acts on it or not - to promote Photos+ files at the expense of ordinary independent ones, so non participation might lead to even worse search placement.

If photos+ files are too expensive to sell, then so is the entire exclusive collection but I've never heard anybody complain that exclusivity makes their files too expensive, they all see the price hike as a benefit of turning exclusive. I've heard people say that going exclusive doesn't increase your sales, I don't recall hearing them say that it causes them to fall.

I don't think that applies, Sean. My files are already available at other places cheaper than they are at iStock but people still choose to buy them at iStock because that is where they are shopping. The same applies to Yuri and it sure as hell hasn't stopped people spending extra to buy his at iS.

In any case, the price comparison is not with E+, it is with ordinary E. E+ is actually making the same "its worth more" claim twice over, once for being exclusive and again for being exclusive and super good.

The question is, does pricing files at ordinary E level put off customers at iS? I don't see that it does. A lot of exclusive files are generic, anyway, so uniqueness is irrelevant and if people were THAT price sensitive they would only buy their isolated apple shots from independents. But they don't.

Interesting thought. On the other hand, it could be a selling point ... if something costs a bit more people think it is worth more. It's all just guesswork now but I'll find out soon enough.

Somewhat ironic. I opted a few files in last night and already had sales with the new + commission.

XS = 50 cents. I like it.

If you would price your generic hand shake as a + file then you don't understand the benefits of the new collection.

Naturally you would put images into the + collection that have almost none to none competition...