MicrostockGroup

All the renderings form the last batch were rejected with "We found the overall quality of this rendering could be improved." But weeks ago all was accepted, my problem is that many files are from the same series, what suddenly happened with the quality... Last week everything was good (all accepted), this week everything is rejected.

Was there and announcement about rendering quality or IS doesn't accept renderings from non-exclusive contributors anymore?

I'm sorry about the time spent with their archaic upload system. For the 15% I can earn, it's better to sell my files with other agencies. They simply don't deserve quality images for the percent they give. And they still have the highest needs...

Anybody had mass rejection lately, related to the rendering quality?

^ bingo.

The article may not be referring to "quality" in your case, so we'll need a full size image or two posted.

Upload some to dropbox or somewhere - I'm not going to use a zoom function to critique...

hate to be harsh but are you wanting a critique or not?  it sounds more like you are venting and if you don't like the percentage you are getting at IS then why are you even bothering?  I understand the frustration but when you add "it doesn't worth the time" then I question why are bothering with them?  There are plenty of other agencies to to sell your work.  If IS has you upset then simply stop contributing to them and concentrate on the agencies that accept your work and you make more money. 

I can't critique, I don't even do little ball headed men, but I wondered why the descriptions all say Stock Photography or Stock Image? Is that you or does CS add that to every image. I mean, it's a stock site, isn't the fact that it's a stock photo kind of obvious. What am I missing?

The little pedal car is nice and many of the others, from what I've read and what others have said, all you need to do is change the little guys and you're off and selling again.

Interesting too from Shady Sue, I didn't know that exclusives and Non's had a different review team. I do know that the standards are in theory, (we've seen some questionable examples otherwise)  ...that the standards are identical for EX or Non. But looking at EdStock's recent collection, some standards aren't at all "standard". 

Wait where's the person claiming that robots do the reviews, not humans? We haven't had that one in weeks.

I understand your point but I'm not just black&white. Little money (percent) is infinitely more than nothing. Since I'm a full time contributor, everything counts. Of course, there's a line under what I can't contribute anymore. Yes the percent is the lowest, but there's a strong point I'm still contributing to IS: the amount of sales. Even if they pay the lowest percent, the total sum at the end of the month is greater that at some given agencies that offer ~30...50%. When this income will drop under a certain amount, sure I will not contribute anymore.