Using free or purchased models with a simple sphere wrapped with a texture does not show a level of work high enough for iStock acceptance (thank goodness). This is the kind of thing that is great for SS, but not for IS.
Had I received a 'not suitable as stock' rejection, your reply might make sense. As it is, it's merely a pointless insult that doesn't address my original question. Frankly, I'm offended by the rudeness of your response.
I wanted to know how to go about submitting images that contain NASA content. I didn't ask for a critique of my work, and if iStock rejected it for quality issues, then they should have stated the real reason for the rejection.
Quote from sjocke: If I were concerned about submitting to SS and an unasked for critique, your post would be very useful. Thanks for the tips!
lol no problem, have to say though talk about giving it but cant take it!
