MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: When were your fraudulent downloads relative to when it became known at iS?  (Read 10942 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BooKitty

« Reply #25 on: February 04, 2011, 07:26 »
0
Whats the point everyone writing telling how many images they lost??  in the end we have 10 pages of numbers??

Misery loves company. It feels good to commiserate with others in the same crappy situation. People need to vent and share and then try and move on. I think it's called a human reaction.  :-[

I did not lose any money.. no one wants to steal my stuff, let alone buy it legit.


« Reply #26 on: February 04, 2011, 07:45 »
0
You other guys who had just one photo nicked - was it your best seller?
Mine are from 12/22 and 12/23. 3 images stolen, one a good seller with above 30 DLs in half year.

« Reply #27 on: February 04, 2011, 08:19 »
0
Whats the point everyone writing telling how many images they lost??  in the end we have 10 pages of numbers??

So that we can appreciate the sheer scale of what has been going on __ and therefore fully understand just how abysmal Istockphoto's efforts to protect our work has been.

« Reply #28 on: February 04, 2011, 08:26 »
0
Scary scenario! if IS, the biggest one where all their contributors becomes the victims, then what about all the rest?  At this moment I think the entire Micro industry is in jeopardy, built on a very fragile business module over an Internet where everything is possible and with no stopping.

Seams to me this scam was engineered and whatever is the mastermind behind it, they did a bloody good job, undetected for months. Probably just pure luck it was detected at all?

No. It is apparently almost unique to Istockphoto because their developers are the worst in the business. If they can't even provide real-time statistics (for years) let alone a functioning search engine (not to mention all the other major and minor issues) then I am not at all surprised that their defense systems have been breached by someone that actually knows what they are doing. I'd expect more of this to come at Istockphoto but probably nowhere else.

lagereek

« Reply #29 on: February 04, 2011, 08:56 »
0
Scary scenario! if IS, the biggest one where all their contributors becomes the victims, then what about all the rest?  At this moment I think the entire Micro industry is in jeopardy, built on a very fragile business module over an Internet where everything is possible and with no stopping.

Seams to me this scam was engineered and whatever is the mastermind behind it, they did a bloody good job, undetected for months. Probably just pure luck it was detected at all?

No. It is apparently almost unique to Istockphoto because their developers are the worst in the business. If they can't even provide real-time statistics (for years) let alone a functioning search engine (not to mention all the other major and minor issues) then I am not at all surprised that their defense systems have been breached by someone that actually knows what they are doing. I'd expect more of this to come at Istockphoto but probably nowhere else.

Oh No, just wait and see, unique for IS? well maybe this but all other downers will soon be everyday occurances with the others, its bound to happen and will.

« Reply #30 on: February 04, 2011, 09:03 »
0
Whats the point everyone writing telling how many images they lost??  in the end we have 10 pages of numbers??

If my images were fraudulently purchased 10 days after iS knew of a problem, I think that would be nice to know.  The motivation for starting this thread (i.e. when the downloads occurred, not the numbers) was to see just how quickly iS reacted.

« Reply #31 on: February 04, 2011, 09:16 »
0
Oh No, just wait and see, unique for IS? well maybe this but all other downers will soon be everyday occurances with the others, its bound to happen and will.

We already have 'wait and see'. They tried it on at BigStock (at the same time at Istockphoto) but quickly got stopped. It is virtually certain that the same gang attempted the same scam at SS, DT and FT (why wouldn't they?) but without any apparent sucess. Istockphoto turned out to provide the most welcoming facilities for the thieves and apparently they only found out about it through contributors expressing concerns about unusual buying patterns. It's even taken over a month for Istockphoto to track down what was stolen and inform the contributors. Incredible.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
5 Replies
3598 Views
Last post August 21, 2008, 20:34
by michaeldb
10 Replies
5582 Views
Last post March 21, 2011, 11:51
by click_click
21 Replies
12404 Views
Last post August 15, 2011, 15:08
by RacePhoto
12 Replies
7232 Views
Last post March 17, 2016, 12:17
by Noedelhap
0 Replies
1594 Views
Last post November 24, 2022, 03:49
by PokemonMaster

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors