Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 16:00

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print

Topic: New license revealed  

(Read 2464 times)
Dreamstime News


« on: February 01, 2008, 07:01 »

>February 1, 2008  (05:22) - posted by Achilles
<span class=h7>New license revealed! As of today, Dreamstime accepts non-model released and non-property released images that are directly pertinent to current events, news and political stories, and social and cultural scenes. Read more...</span>
« Last Edit: February 01, 2008, 07:02 by leaf »
Logged


DepositPhotos.com
le_cyclope
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2008, 17:31 »

Well it was a matter of time before one agency closed the gap between RF photos and "press" type photos.

Now every stock photograph is a potential press photograph... Wonder what will be their reaction!

Papparazzi, grab your camera and get out!

Claude


Ignore | Logged


Vonkara



« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2008, 17:45 »

That's great. But George Bush already been close to me when last summer he was at Montebello. It's not going to happend an other time shortly Sad


Ignore | Logged


grp_photo


« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2008, 18:36 »

Imho it's dumb to submit editorial images to Microstock-agencies and news related editorial even more.
Just another bad move from Dreamstime after the subscription-prison.


Ignore | Logged


madelaide
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2008, 18:39 »

Finally newsworthy as newsworthy actually means.

Regards,
Adelaide


Ignore | Logged


stokfoto



« Reply #5 on: February 01, 2008, 19:22 »

Imho it's dumb to submit editorial images to Microstock-agencies and news related editorial even more.
I agree with that unless they apply a different pricing structure to it I don't see much point uploading editorial content a microstock site.


Ignore | Logged


epixx


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2008, 23:04 »

Imho it's dumb to submit editorial images to Microstock-agencies and news related editorial even more.
I agree with that unless they apply a different pricing structure to it I don't see much point uploading editorial content a microstock site.

Agree


Ignore | Logged


faber


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #7 on: February 01, 2008, 23:50 »

Imho it's dumb to submit editorial images to Microstock-agencies and news related editorial even more.
I agree with that unless they apply a different pricing structure to it I don't see much point uploading editorial content a microstock site.

Agree
Agree


Ignore | Logged


madelaide
« Reply #8 on: February 02, 2008, 10:33 »

I agree with that unless they apply a different pricing structure to it I don't see much point uploading editorial content a microstock site.
I don't have much experience with truly newsworthy images, but I believe it's more likely that an EL will be used, at least for printed editorial content? 

Regards,
Adelaide


Ignore | Logged


null



« Reply #9 on: February 02, 2008, 11:47 »

Imho it's dumb to submit editorial images to Microstock-agencies and news related editorial even more.
Just another bad move from Dreamstime after the subscription-prison.

Why? DT is just widening their customers base. SS has it already and I have some editorial there that sells like cake. It can only benefit the photogs, and that can't be said necessarily of the subscription move.

For real news, the approval process takes too long. But in the message of Achilles on the DT forum, he also mentioned educational and cultural shots in a general sense. We'll just have to see how their criteria evolve.


Ignore | Logged


Karimala



« Reply #10 on: February 02, 2008, 13:34 »

No thanks. 

I've been selling editorial photos at SS since the beginning (Sept. '05), and it's just not worth it.  My most important, historically significant editorial shot has only earned $10.95 since January 2006 (it's a photo of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger being sworn in at his inauguration).  I have since stopped uploading editorial photos to SS.  So until DT adds an opt out on subscriptions for editorial, all of mine will be headed to midstock and macrostock agencies.


Ignore | Logged


Vonkara



« Reply #11 on: February 02, 2008, 13:50 »

Imho it's dumb to submit editorial images to Microstock-agencies and news related editorial even more.
I agree with that unless they apply a different pricing structure to it I don't see much point uploading editorial content a microstock site.
I agree that if these pictures can be used for some kind of news journal... they must pay for the appropriate extended license


Ignore | Logged


Microstock InsiderEnvateo Photo Tools
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
A routine check performed yesterday revealed more than 6
Microstock News
Dreamstime News 1 802 Last post March 07, 2007, 15:55
by hatman12
The secret of successful shooters finally revealed « 1 2 »
General Stock Discussion
Gizeh 37 6619 Last post December 22, 2007, 16:36
by a.k.a.-tom
Some SUPER SECRET Techniques Revealed for the first time here « 1 2 »
Photoshop Discussion
rjmiz 26 3625 Last post February 02, 2008, 13:48
by psychocy
RF License Infringements
Crestock.com
josh_crestock 12 2373 Last post May 21, 2008, 02:57
by josh_crestock
Stock Photos Revealed.
General Stock Discussion
contrastaddict 9 858 Last post December 07, 2011, 04:53
by ruigsantos

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc