Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 18:49

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print

Topic: New microstocker :)  

(Read 5086 times)
sauron

New Member


« on: April 22, 2010, 11:20 »

Hello, everyone.

I'm just getting into microstock, just got an account at iphotostock. However I feel the compensation of just 20% is unfair. I'm not interested in being exclusive. Can anyone tell me about another site which offers better money for your work, and other things which a new microstocker might need to know?

Thank you for all replies and advice.

Regards
Sauron

P.S.: Could anyone also tell me which popular microstock site offers the highest percentage to the sellers.


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
cthoman



« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2010, 12:42 »

I love how people just ignore newbies.  Smiley

Anyway...  iStock is one of my better agencies, but results may very. The only way to find out which ones will work for you is to try them out. The poll on the right is how other submitters rate the sites.


Ignore | Logged


FD



« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2010, 12:47 »

I love how people just ignore newbies.  Smiley
Nah, I just was thinking about "iphotostock". Is this a site like "Timesdream"? Well, anyways, congratulations on opening an account. The rest is fairly easy.  Grin


Ignore | Logged


Xalanx


« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2010, 13:02 »

I love how people just ignore newbies.  Smiley
Nah, I just was thinking about "iphotostock". Is this a site like "Timesdream"?

And "StutterShock"

LE: Oh, and yea - hi. Congrats Smiley


Ignore | Logged


cascoly

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2010, 13:20 »

a number of newer sites offer 50 or even 70% royalties, but you won't make as many sales as you will with the high vol subscrition sites;  so it's your choice of what fits best with the type of images you supply - take a look at the various sites listed in the micropoll results - but after the first 4, sales are going to be low

s


Ignore | Logged


sjlocke

iStock Gauge
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2010, 13:31 »

Never heard of 'iphotostock'.


Ignore | Logged


cthoman



« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2010, 13:53 »

Never heard of 'iphotostock'.
I think you are exclusive there in Bizarro world.


Ignore | Logged


lisafx
« Reply #7 on: April 22, 2010, 13:54 »

If the percentages offered in microstock bother you, then you might want to sell under a different business model, like traditional RF or RM.  Trust me, the commission %s aren't going up in micro, they are trending down.  

Consider selling at Alamy, where you get 60% per sale and many of the sales are several hundred $ each.


Ignore | Logged


sauron

New Member


« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2010, 14:28 »

Thank you everyone.  Smiley

And my apologizes for getting istockphoto wrong in the first post.


Ignore | Logged


sweetgirll



« Reply #9 on: April 22, 2010, 16:56 »

HI sauron...

I agree that 20% is not enough....My accountant laughed at me when i said I only get 20% from a distributor ....
I don't like exclusivity , unless is RM.
In some places if.you become exclusive, you can't even sell rejected images or give images away from your site for free...

It seems only a few agencies offer more than 20%...However I'm thinking of starting to do some art for RM.


Ignore | Logged


lisafx
« Reply #10 on: April 22, 2010, 18:00 »


I agree that 20% is not enough....My accountant laughed at me when i said I only get 20% from a distributor ....
I don't like exclusivity , unless is RM.
In some places if.you become exclusive, you can't even sell rejected images or give images away from your site for free...


In the interest of accuracy, most of the credit based micros pay more than 20% (and nobody has any idea what % SS pays).  And only non-exclusives on Istock make 20%, while exclusives can make up to 40%.

Your accountant may think its funny that you only make 20% at Istock, but it's helpful to tell that to models so their expectations of what they will be paid are not too high.  Smiley


Ignore | Logged


FD



« Reply #11 on: April 22, 2010, 23:44 »

And my apologizes for getting istockphoto wrong in the first post.
It was a great occasion to tease you.  Wink
Did you get accepted yet there?
If you want to do microstock seriously, you should. You can't say you've driven a car until you drove a BMW.


Ignore | Logged


jsnover
« Reply #12 on: April 22, 2010, 23:48 »

Hi and welcome.

I was independent for nearly 4 years before becoming exclusive at iStock 18 months ago. The issue of the "fairness" of the split between agency and contributor came up again and again. One or two agencies started up with the central theme of being more fair to photographers and giving them a larger percentage. CanStock started in June 2004 on that premise and while Duncan (who started the business ) is a great guy, the business never really took off, so our "fair" percentage was multiplied by a very small monthly amount.

Bottom line is for a given portfolio, how much per month can each agency earn you. Two of the agencies with the "worst" per image returns (IS and SS) have consistently been #1 and/or #2 for a large number of contributors when looking at monthly income. There are other issues as well - long term vs. short term gain - but the percentage of royalty can be really misleading as a yardstick by which to judge an agency's value to you.

20% of $1,000 per month is a better deal than 50% of $50 per month...

I'd suggest that you start with the "big 4" from the chart at the right - but be aware of time commitments (DT holds files for 6 months and BigStock for 3 months).


Ignore | Logged


BaldricksTrousers

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #13 on: April 23, 2010, 00:05 »

Do we know what the % return from shutterstock is? I don't. I vaguely recall that a long time ago they said it was about 50%. In cash terms each sale gives a low return but the same may not be true using percentages.

Microstock is all about the total return, anyway, it's not about the percentage kept by the agency.


Ignore | Logged


sauron

New Member


« Reply #14 on: April 23, 2010, 08:02 »

Thank you, everyone.

Did you get accepted yet there?
If you want to do microstock seriously, you should. You can't say you've driven a car until you drove a BMW.

Well, I sent my three photos for review about a week ago. Since I did not hear from them yet, and I didn't want to contribute to them anyway; I've written to them to terminate my account. I currently am going to upload only on 123RF for a while.  Smiley


Ignore | Logged


sauron

New Member


« Reply #15 on: April 23, 2010, 08:40 »

All the ten images I uploaded for review were reject for "Poor lighting/composition".  Undecided


Ignore | Logged


lisafx
« Reply #16 on: April 23, 2010, 09:06 »

I currently am going to upload only on 123RF for a while.  Smiley

Well good luck with that.   Roll Eyes

123RF is one of the lowest performing sites I contribute to.  I've been with them since they opened (4 years or so?) and have over 5,000 images yet still barely make payout each month.


Ignore | Logged


Sign up with Shutterstock
FD



« Reply #17 on: April 23, 2010, 10:00 »

All the ten images I uploaded for review were reject for "Poor lighting/composition".  Undecided
It might help of you would put links to the images on a free image site here. It's easier to comment.


Ignore | Logged


luissantos84

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #18 on: April 23, 2010, 10:17 »

All the ten images I uploaded for review were reject for "Poor lighting/composition".  Undecided
It might help of you would put links to the images on a free image site here. It's easier to comment.

don't place them here, this guy will crash you down ehehe, just kidding Smiley

apart from this join the top5, you can see them on the right side of this forum, the others are just not worth!


Ignore | Logged


vlad_the_imp


« Reply #19 on: April 23, 2010, 10:20 »

"You can't say you've driven a car until you drove a BMW."

You've driven FFS.

I've got a 911 Turbo and I've never driven a BMW.


Ignore | Logged


sauron

New Member


« Reply #20 on: April 23, 2010, 10:25 »

This is one:
http://bit.ly/9vh5Gv
« Last Edit: April 23, 2010, 10:33 by sauron »

Ignore | Logged


steheap


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #21 on: April 23, 2010, 11:22 »

I'll have a go at commenting as I have myself confused getting a tricky shot with something that is saleable. When I first glanced at the image, I thought it was a funny shaped tree with nothing interesting at all. Then I saw the owl, but it's color and contrast almost makes it invisible. Finally, the branches on the right make it very cluttered. So, while it was good to capture the owl like that, I'm not sure anyone glancing at lots of images would see the owl, and then I'm not sure how anyone would use it.

Steve


Ignore | Logged


Magnum


iStock Gauge
« Reply #22 on: April 23, 2010, 11:23 »

Unfortunately they were right about poor lighting/composition.  Also the subject is waaaay to small.   Would you pick this photo among 1000 others if you for example make a search at Istock.

Try again and upload here so we can help u.


Ignore | Logged


sauron

New Member


« Reply #23 on: April 23, 2010, 11:34 »

Thank you steheap and magnum. Could you tell me how to improve my composition and lighting?

Many thanks
Sauron

Here's another one I submitted:

http://bit.ly/asyR5k
« Last Edit: April 23, 2010, 11:46 by sauron »

Ignore | Logged


steheap


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #24 on: April 23, 2010, 11:50 »

I'm not sure the lighting is wrong (although the sky is very boring) - it is the fact that you can't see the object that you are trying to photograph, and even if it was a bit closer, it is still almost the same shade as the tree. As for improving composition, read some photo books and magazines, look at the stock sites and what sells. I'm not sure it is easy to explain in a forum post!

Just for background, I wrote a blog about my own experiences in getting into stock photography 2 years ago (as have a lot of members here). In the early days, I did go through my frustrations and successes as I got more experience.

Steve
http://www.backyardsilver.com


Ignore | Logged


Microstock InsiderEnvateo Photo Tools
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc