Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 19:20

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print

Topic: What stock topic to shoot in studio?  

(Read 3275 times)
ShadySue
« Reply #25 on: June 28, 2010, 10:50 »


Mhhh did't thought about that - how do i found out if there is a IP issue with the Clothes? The Top is from Promod (something like H&M).
Probably depends on the inspector you get. Doesn't matter if its a multiple chain store which may have sold gazillions of the dress: it's pretty identifiable. I wouldn't even think about using it for RF.


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
Amos Struck
« Reply #26 on: June 28, 2010, 10:52 »

You make me feeling afraid buddy......

what do the others think about this?


Ignore | Logged


lisafx
« Reply #27 on: June 28, 2010, 11:05 »

Take plain clothes or with a simple generic pattern in the fabric, like plaid or stripes. Hint for a faster workflow: make sure the buttons have no logo on it.

This is very good advice.  If models are wearing a specific design, even if it is pretty generic (cats, fish, hearts, etc.) I have had them rejected.  Not because they actually were trademarked, but because the inspector didn't know if they were or not.  Better to go with plain clothes and save yourself the hassle. 


Ignore | Logged


luissantos84

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #28 on: June 28, 2010, 11:53 »

You make me feeling afraid buddy......

what do the others think about this?

you have plain tops/shirts in H&M Smiley I don't shoot many people but got already a few rejected because of trademark!


Ignore | Logged


gaja

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #29 on: June 29, 2010, 11:26 »

i got the cutest reject from Bigstock the other day:
Quote
Reason: Potential copyright / trademark / privacy issue with photo (could be: copyrighted art, visible logo, license plate number, etc) sorry...
Please remove logo on hat... very adorable child!

That little bit of politeness really made my day.

The issue is the tiny teddy bear thingy on this cap (as you can see, DT didn't object):
http://www.dreamstime.com/little-child-playing-in-the-snow-thumb12463105.jpg


Ignore | Logged


luissantos84

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #30 on: June 29, 2010, 11:46 »

i got the cutest reject from Bigstock the other day:
Quote
Reason: Potential copyright / trademark / privacy issue with photo (could be: copyrighted art, visible logo, license plate number, etc) sorry...
Please remove logo on hat... very adorable child!

That little bit of politeness really made my day.

The issue is the tiny teddy bear thingy on this cap (as you can see, DT didn't object):
http://www.dreamstime.com/little-child-playing-in-the-snow-thumb12463105.jpg


nice Smiley


Ignore | Logged


lisafx
« Reply #31 on: June 29, 2010, 15:46 »

i got the cutest reject from Bigstock the other day:
Quote
Reason: Potential copyright / trademark / privacy issue with photo (could be: copyrighted art, visible logo, license plate number, etc) sorry...
Please remove logo on hat... very adorable child!

That little bit of politeness really made my day.

The issue is the tiny teddy bear thingy on this cap (as you can see, DT didn't object):
http://www.dreamstime.com/little-child-playing-in-the-snow-thumb12463105.jpg


How sweet!  I really appreciate when the reviewers take time to add personal notes, although of course I realize they can't do it often...

And they are right about the adorable child Smiley


Ignore | Logged


gaja

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #32 on: June 30, 2010, 02:16 »

Thank you! Smiley


Ignore | Logged


Envateo Photo ToolsMicrostock Insider
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc