Yeah, i saw a big write up about it yesterday on Gizmodo. They are making things tough for publishers because a publisher can't offer anything inside the app that a person can follow a link to buy outside the app - basically meaning the publisher can't direct someone to go outside the app and skip the app store commission. It sounds a lot more involved than that though - I'm just not good at explaining it. You can read on Gizmodo if you want the full story
Gizmodo linkYes and Apple isn't running the app site so someone can get free advertising and free links to sell the same items for less on their own home site. Not too stupid to allow people to freely use the Apple site for marketing and then pay them nothing?
Sounds like good business, not anything nefarious?
I think Gizmodo doesn't get it. There is no free lunch, someone has to pay for it, somehow.