Author Topic: 3rd Rejection from IStock, here's the group I'm thinking I'll use this time. (Read 15519 times)

webbing · « **Reply #50 on:** May 26, 2011, 20:45 »

So are we saying that this.
http://www.ltsw.com/public/_MG_1517_Small.jpg

Would be better than
http://www.ltsw.com/public/Girldrinkingwater.jpg

Or maybe I shoiuld ask is it better or even close to acceptable?

webbing · « **Reply #51 on:** May 26, 2011, 20:47 »

Quote from: cclapper on May 26, 2011, 15:56

Quote from: webbing on May 26, 2011, 10:13
On a seperate but connected issue, do you folks think https://www.lynda.com/ is worth while for training?

I am a big fan of https://www.lynda.com/.

Here is a link to their photography-related courses:

http://www.lynda.com/Photography-training-tutorials/70-0.html

You can subscribe by the month for $25.00 or $37.50 which allows the downloading of exercise files.

I did subscribe, thanks

luissantos84 · « **Reply #52 on:** May 27, 2011, 03:04 »

Quote from: webbing on May 26, 2011, 20:45

So are we saying that this.
http://www.ltsw.com/public/_MG_1517_Small.jpg

Would be better than
http://www.ltsw.com/public/Girldrinkingwater.jpg

Or maybe I shoiuld ask is it better or even close to acceptable?

it has a lot of noise.. seriously I would shoot more and be more ready to join IS, SS, whatever..

if you fail at IS you will have the 5th time when?

sobm · « **Reply #53 on:** May 27, 2011, 05:09 »

Quote from: webbing on May 26, 2011, 20:45

So are we saying that this.
http://www.ltsw.com/public/_MG_1517_Small.jpg

Would be better than
http://www.ltsw.com/public/Girldrinkingwater.jpg

Or maybe I shoiuld ask is it better or even close to acceptable?

i just see alot of noise all over ,i check up your exif and it shows iso 200,how come it could get such noise at iso200??I guess maybe you should clean up your camera sensor or what?

plus they dont like the lighting like that from my experience!

webbing · « **Reply #54 on:** May 27, 2011, 09:16 »

Quote from: luissantos84 on May 27, 2011, 03:04

Quote from: webbing on May 26, 2011, 20:45
So are we saying that this.
http://www.ltsw.com/public/_MG_1517_Small.jpg

Would be better than
http://www.ltsw.com/public/Girldrinkingwater.jpg

Or maybe I shoiuld ask is it better or even close to acceptable?

it has a lot of noise.. seriously I would shoot more and be more ready to join IS, Shutterstock, whatever..

if you fail at IS you will have the 5th time when?

I was only putting it up here because someone said to try to reduce the sze and see if that helped.

luissantos84 · « **Reply #55 on:** May 27, 2011, 09:25 »

Quote from: webbing on May 27, 2011, 09:16

Quote from: luissantos84 on May 27, 2011, 03:04
Quote from: webbing on May 26, 2011, 20:45
So are we saying that this.
http://www.ltsw.com/public/_MG_1517_Small.jpg

Would be better than
http://www.ltsw.com/public/Girldrinkingwater.jpg

Or maybe I shoiuld ask is it better or even close to acceptable?

it has a lot of noise.. seriously I would shoot more and be more ready to join IS, Shutterstock, whatever..

if you fail at IS you will have the 5th time when?

I was only putting it up here because someone said to try to reduce the sze and see if that helped.

it does help and it does look better too.. don´t know if it is enough to get approve these days..

a1bercik · « **Reply #56 on:** May 27, 2011, 16:28 »

Also I would recommend Lightroom - as an image library with great processing section (for RAW files).
If you have clean pictures (no dust on the sensor, relatively clean lenses) in RAW format, of course - you can collect, process and keyword them in one location, which is very, very handy.
tv.adobe.com/product/lightroom/ <- this is link to the selection of videos 'by Adobe' and this shoud give you idea what is this software for.

Good luck W.

Pav

gwhitton · « **Reply #57 on:** May 27, 2011, 16:44 »

Quote from: Dreamframer on May 25, 2011, 14:11

All your images are taken at ISO 200, which is unacceptable in most cases. Lower ISO to 100.

You've gotta be kidding me. ISO 200 is the native ISO used by one of the two major camera makers in the world (on most of its cameras). And that setting works just fine if you've correctly exposed your shot.

SNP · « **Reply #58 on:** May 27, 2011, 17:49 »

Quote from: gwhitton on May 27, 2011, 16:44

Quote from: Dreamframer on May 25, 2011, 14:11
All your images are taken at ISO 200, which is unacceptable in most cases. Lower ISO to 100.

You've gotta be kidding me. ISO 200 is the native ISO used by one of the two major camera makers in the world (on most of its cameras). And that setting works just fine if you've correctly exposed your shot.

I do shoot at ISO 100 most of the time, but most DSLRs used by iSock contributors have native ISO 200. ISO 200 is fine in most cases. I have images accepted on iStock that were shot at ISO 800. this statement about ISO 200 being unacceptable is simply untrue.

ShadySue · « **Reply #59 on:** May 27, 2011, 17:59 »

Quote from: SNP on May 27, 2011, 17:49

Quote from: gwhitton on May 27, 2011, 16:44
Quote from: Dreamframer on May 25, 2011, 14:11
All your images are taken at ISO 200, which is unacceptable in most cases. Lower ISO to 100.

You've gotta be kidding me. ISO 200 is the native ISO used by one of the two major camera makers in the world (on most of its cameras). And that setting works just fine if you've correctly exposed your shot.

I do shoot at ISO 100 most of the time, but most DSLRs used by iSock contributors have native ISO 200. ISO 200 is fine in most cases. I have images accepted on iStock that were shot at ISO 800. this statement about ISO 200 being unacceptable is simply untrue.

Yup, I've got a few @ 1600 and at least three @ 3200. Sized down, admittedly!

loop · « **Reply #60 on:** May 27, 2011, 19:31 »

I have lots of photos accepted at ISO 400 and more. I usually use that in good light conditions, just to shot with a faster speed and freeze movement.

SNP · « **Reply #61 on:** May 27, 2011, 21:39 »

Quote from: loop on May 27, 2011, 19:31

I have lots of photos accepted at ISO 400 and more. I usually use that in good light conditions, just to shot with a faster speed and freeze movement.

exactly....this is why I shot at higher ISO in good light. but something tells me this might be beyond the scope of this particular discussion ;-)

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: 3rd Rejection from IStock, here's the group I'm thinking I'll use this time. (Read 15519 times)

webbing

webbing

luissantos84

sobm

webbing

luissantos84

a1bercik

gwhitton

SNP

ShadySue

loop

SNP

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors