MicrostockGroup

Morning all!

I'm new to the forum after being recommended to check the place out by a photographer friend.

Before I go any further, I hope that this is being posted in the right place!

Photography is all I do and since I started out down the self-employment route back in November 2010 I've managed to get signed up with a few agencies.

One of those was PhotoLibrary which has since been purchased by Getty. Macrostock wise I'm also with Arcaid, Robert Harding (images waiting) and Alamy. Microstock it's Dreamstime, IStockPhoto and Fotolia.

This year has been when sales have slowly started trickling through.

My macrostock work:

Getty: http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/Search/Search.aspx?assettype=image&artist=Julian+Elliott. There should be more on here but my work hasn't yet been migrated over from PL.
Arcaid: http://www.tinyurl.com/6d3rcoc
Alamy: http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/19BC4189-F7B0-4C87-B52C-9376C277D756/Julian+Elliott.html

Microstock is here:

Dreamstime: http://www.dreamstime.com/Julianelliott_info
Fotolia: http://en.fotolia.com/p/203024744
IStockPhoto: http://www.istockphoto.com/search/portfolio/5297315/?facets=%7B%2225%22%3A%226%22%7D#53601cd

Be interested in any feedback

Thanks

Jools!

Thanks for the comments Leaf!

I'm lucky that I have access to some nice scenics around here that are always commercially viable for things such as travel guides etc. Living in the Loire Valley does have some benefits.

Shutterstock has been tried but I failed the initial submission test. I'm not too worried about that due to some of the other agencies I'm with.

I hadn't heard of depositphotos until you mentioned them. I'll give them a look to see the lay of the land.

Right now, I'd like to make enough cash to get out there once a month to keep things fresh.

I looked at your IS portfolio

Nice work, if they were a little punchier I think they would be more saleable.

Other than that just upload a lot more

Thanks for all the replies and comments folks.

So far, my macrostock work is just about dripping through. It didn't help that my images with PhotoLibrary that should be on the big G haven't migrated over. When they were there, I had a decent sale within the first month. It was just after that the takeover happened.

The images are spread according to the library. The microstock tends to be images from my old digital SLR plus the rejects from the bigger libraries.

Thankfully, I get magazine work to help supplement things.

True.
A lot of people do people in studios. A lot. Only the really good ones will get the sales.

So, I'm guessing that having a thick skin around these parts is necessary!

As I said, I get magazine work so I must be doing something right

The biggest problem with IS is the "noise" on the site.  Way too many low sellers are allowed to throw images against the wall and see if they stick.  This buries the best producers images and gives the customers headaches in finding quality images. Not promoting Sean more than a person with 9000 images and 5000 sales happens because of the mass uploading by average producers are not penalized outside of low sales.  The sales per image ratio should be a factor in how many one can upload.  Low selling artist should be dropped just like any other creative business.  New talent should be promoted based on sales.   

One of the weirdest getty/istock merger events was getty scouring flicker for new artist which I saw on the national news to put on getty.  So they spent 50 mil on istock and weren't looking for artist that were not getting good exposure on istock.   

Your work is above average; that doesn't mean it will or won't do well on micro. Micro is a totally different market than 'illustrating a book'.
You just have to suck it and see how it works for you.

I'd say all the comments on this page are pretty spot-on.

But as for the quality of your work, just looking through thumbnails I'd say your work is quite stunning.  Really fantastic stuff.  Kudos!

However, as has been pointed out, there just aren't that many buyers at any given moment who need what you're offering.   You really have to ask yourself every time you post an image, Who will buy this and How will it be used?  It's all about helping the buyer communicate a concept he/she is trying to convey.   Quality aside, the more potential applications you can envision for your image, the greater chance it has to generate real sales.  Your pics, as great as they are, just don't scream any particular concepts aside from Peace, Beauty, Nature, etc, and in the modern world of blogs, advertising, etc., it takes an image with a really powerful "message" to excite buyers.

Best of luck on your upcoming trip... it sounds like those kinds of assignments are where your talents will truly shine.  I believe you'll ultimately find that  Microstock is a business where photographic talent matters far less than business savvy.

You might be surprised Sean. Only yesterday I sold 5 EL's at SS, 4 of which were landscapes and none of which were anything special. Nowadays I wouldn't go out of my way to shoot landscapes for stock, as it is probably the most difficult subject to get a return on, but if they already exist then given enough time they will certainly generate some money.

Good work btw Jools. I particularly like your treatment of the beech trees at Kingston Lacy. They're a surprisingly difficult subject to frame well.

Thank you for your comments on my work at Kingston Lacy. It is an area that I know particularly well and have shot numerous times.

Just managed to have a batch of them approved on Getty as RM.

I looked at your Getty portfolio as well as iStock and DT. The thing that struck me was that it looked like you'd done exactly what you said - sent the RM rejects to microstock.

I wouldn't argue with trying to make the most out of your work, but I would suggest that you won't see much return from the microstock agencies with that approach. I found your Getty portfolio visually appealing and the microstock images not so much. You might find that some other work that doesn't suit the RM agencies might be a better microstock option for you - perhaps you have access to a location or some gear that might give you useful images for the micros.

I think you have a very painterly Eye. Most don't. Shoot what turns YOU on. Thats the only way to be unique. Buyers will find you. Although I do think Variety and lots of it is the way to go. Use that great eye and do some people shots. Good Job.And get a few 1000 More then ask.