Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2012, 22:38

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print

Topic: PHOTO: CG Xmas Tree Rejection  

(Read 1270 times)
adijr


iStock Gauge
« on: October 30, 2010, 12:28 »

Hello all,

Noobiness here, I'm hoping some of you can give me some pointers. I've had the following CG Christmas-tree shot rejected at istock for the standard composition reason: "We're sorry, but we found the overall composition of this file could be improved."

Any suggestions would be appreciated.
http://depo.fotozygous.com/stock/forCritique.jpg (large image!)

Thanks!
Adrian


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
LSD72



« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2010, 12:51 »

I would probably say too much dead space to the right. Takes a lot of the focus off of the tree.

Edit: With what Sean is saying about IS.... forget about submitting a Raster to them. IS does not like rasters.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2010, 12:55 by LSD72 »

Ignore | Logged


sjlocke

iStock Gauge
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2010, 12:52 »

That's really below IS standards.  It's more of an SS level composition.  The bg isn't bad, although I don't know why you put a white vignette around it.  But the 'tree' is basically a triangle of blurry glowy circles and star brushes.  Not even really 'cg'.  IS might have taken that a few years ago, but not now.


Ignore | Logged


adijr


iStock Gauge
« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2010, 14:17 »

Thanks for all your feedback so far!

To address some comments
the reason for the whiteish border was just a design to go with the winter theme. It's no problem to take it out, I just thought it looked allright.
I guess I should have called this 'raster' instead of cg... to me cg stands for computer graphics, and is a pretty general term. It was not done in photoshop or any other such program, so I didn't even think that they could be interpreted as PS brushes, very interesting!

I could move the tree more to the right, no problem, I had left that much text on the right for text, etc. I thought of that too when I got the rejection, though I'm certainly not sure.

So on to the more worrisome issue: that istock doesn't like rasters or that this would have been good for IS some time ago but not now: so, if I say follow all the advice (move tree, take out vignetting, improve shape of tree, and maybe whatever other people have to say), is it still likely not to get in?

Thank you very much for your time, and have a good weekend!
-adijr


Ignore | Logged


madelaide
« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2010, 14:18 »

I don't mind the extra space for text, as the background isn't empty.


Ignore | Logged


adijr


iStock Gauge
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2010, 00:22 »

...and a couple of weeks later i caught some time to work on this. I tried to improve the image overall while taking into account what you all said. It's pretty much a different image now... Does this have a chance at getting in?

http://depo.fotozygous.com/stock/gct_wm.jpg

Thank you for all your feedback again,

adijr


Ignore | Logged


Envateo Photo ToolsMicrostock Insider
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Xmas
Site Related
madelaide 2 863 Last post February 26, 2007, 03:16
by leaf
type of photo rejection
Fotolia.com
vphoto 0 700 Last post December 16, 2007, 09:42
by vphoto
Are you uploading during Xmas?
General Stock Discussion
sharply_done 23 2989 Last post December 28, 2008, 00:57
by shank_ali
Xmas sucks.. « 1 2 »
Off Topic
shank_ali 30 3977 Last post December 25, 2008, 04:20
by microstockinsider
100% Photo rejection - ouch
Fotolia.com
bobkeenan 21 2318 Last post July 08, 2009, 18:16
by Squat

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc