MicrostockGroup
Microstock Photography Forum - General => Photo Critique => Topic started by: webbing on May 29, 2011, 12:15
-
Would you use any of these for the IS application, if so which one(s)?
http://www.ltsw.com/public/ExtremeDeerCrossingSign.jpg (http://www.ltsw.com/public/ExtremeDeerCrossingSign.jpg)
http://www.ltsw.com/public/FireDangerWarningSign.jpg (http://www.ltsw.com/public/FireDangerWarningSign.jpg)
http://www.ltsw.com/public/Interstate40signonbluecloudysky.jpg (http://www.ltsw.com/public/Interstate40signonbluecloudysky.jpg)
http://www.ltsw.com/public/Route66signonbluesky.jpg (http://www.ltsw.com/public/Route66signonbluesky.jpg)
-
Would you use any of these for the IS application, if so which one(s)?
[url]http://www.ltsw.com/public/ExtremeDeerCrossingSign.jpg[/url] ([url]http://www.ltsw.com/public/ExtremeDeerCrossingSign.jpg[/url])
[url]http://www.ltsw.com/public/FireDangerWarningSign.jpg[/url] ([url]http://www.ltsw.com/public/FireDangerWarningSign.jpg[/url])
[url]http://www.ltsw.com/public/Interstate40signonbluecloudysky.jpg[/url] ([url]http://www.ltsw.com/public/Interstate40signonbluecloudysky.jpg[/url])
[url]http://www.ltsw.com/public/Route66signonbluesky.jpg[/url] ([url]http://www.ltsw.com/public/Route66signonbluesky.jpg[/url])
Not sure if you can do editorial on the app or not, if not then #2 won't work.
I like #3 a lot, but I think I like 4 more.
I think the #1 is really good but #4 is the best one and would work for the application, if you think otherwise please let me know and why.
-
hmmm... you have children right? and you live nest some really good looking natural scenery? so...
-
#1 donīt see what can a reviewer like in it.. there just a gorgeous blue sky..
#2 trademark for sure..
#3 not in focus and far from focus
#4 not tack sharp (I would shoot again there but a kind of 3/4 of the sign and the other 1/4 with blue sky, and a little on the side (not front)
this last #4 has a lot of sensor spots on it really close to the sign (left and up)
shoot "girl/boy" again :)
-
Interstate 40: this photo is not sharp, I would delete it from the hard disk
Route 66: dust spot in the upper right corner, if you fix that - maybe, I don't know
Deer sign: the same dust spot
(I guess Luis was faster with typing)
-
#1 donīt see what can a reviewer like in it.. there just a gorgeous blue sky..
#2 trademark for sure..
#3 not in focus and far from focus
#4 not tack sharp (I would shoot again there but a kind of 3/4 of the sign and the other 1/4 with blue sky, and a little on the side (not front)
this last #4 has a lot of sensor spots on it really close to the sign (left and up)
shoot "girl/boy" again :)
Yeah, I saw the sensor spots too. First I thought they might be on the lens, then the filter, finally the senso. Did the auto-clean that, that didn't work. Just spent 2 hours clean, test, clean, test... Finally, I think I got it. Need to re-shoot 3 and 4. So are we saying Smokey can't be submitted for the application?
Thanks all.
-
Would you use any of these for the IS application, if so which one(s)?
[url]http://www.ltsw.com/public/ExtremeDeerCrossingSign.jpg[/url] ([url]http://www.ltsw.com/public/ExtremeDeerCrossingSign.jpg[/url])
[url]http://www.ltsw.com/public/FireDangerWarningSign.jpg[/url] ([url]http://www.ltsw.com/public/FireDangerWarningSign.jpg[/url])
[url]http://www.ltsw.com/public/Interstate40signonbluecloudysky.jpg[/url] ([url]http://www.ltsw.com/public/Interstate40signonbluecloudysky.jpg[/url])
[url]http://www.ltsw.com/public/Route66signonbluesky.jpg[/url] ([url]http://www.ltsw.com/public/Route66signonbluesky.jpg[/url])
Sorry, none of them will work for application and don't forget to watermark them next time. Just a friendly advice if you don't want to see your photos for free somewhere on the web.
-
#1 donīt see what can a reviewer like in it.. there just a gorgeous blue sky..
#2 trademark for sure..
#3 not in focus and far from focus
#4 not tack sharp (I would shoot again there but a kind of 3/4 of the sign and the other 1/4 with blue sky, and a little on the side (not front)
this last #4 has a lot of sensor spots on it really close to the sign (left and up)
shoot "girl/boy" again :)
Yeah, I saw the sensor spots too. First I thought they might be on the lens, then the filter, finally the senso. Did the auto-clean that, that didn't work. Just spent 2 hours clean, test, clean, test... Finally, I think I got it. Need to re-shoot 3 and 4. So are we saying Smokey can't be submitted for the application?
Thanks all.
guess not, I donīt know Smokey but sure it was design by someone.. really donīt know
-
#1 donīt see what can a reviewer like in it.. there just a gorgeous blue sky..
#2 trademark for sure..
#3 not in focus and far from focus
#4 not tack sharp (I would shoot again there but a kind of 3/4 of the sign and the other 1/4 with blue sky, and a little on the side (not front)
this last #4 has a lot of sensor spots on it really close to the sign (left and up)
shoot "girl/boy" again :)
Yeah, I saw the sensor spots too. First I thought they might be on the lens, then the filter, finally the senso. Did the auto-clean that, that didn't work. Just spent 2 hours clean, test, clean, test... Finally, I think I got it. Need to re-shoot 3 and 4. So are we saying Smokey can't be submitted for the application?
Thanks all.
guess not, I donīt know Smokey but sure it was design by someone.. really donīt know
Oh man, I feel stupid now. It would need to be submitted as editorial, but I don't know if you can do that on the application.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smokey_Bear (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smokey_Bear)