Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2012, 01:22

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print

Topic: Pre-submission critique  

(Read 330 times)
Konadan

New Member


« on: October 15, 2011, 20:29 »

I rather like this photo an am thinking of submitting it to istock for one of the original three. What do you folks think?

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/16375342/Iguana%20close%20up%20w%20watermark.jpg

Thanks for your help. Smiley


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
PaulieWalnuts


iStock Gauge
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2011, 20:47 »

It's a cool shot but sorry, no. Way too much noise, not overly sharp, and other technical problems. Even if you fix the technical problems I'd question the saleability. Demand is probably pretty limited and unless this is some sort of rare reptile there are probably a gazillion reptile shots already.


Ignore | Logged


digitalexpression



« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2011, 16:45 »

There are applications for noise suppression that work beautifully. I use Imagenomic Noiseware Professional and it would knock the noise right out of that shot.

Considering that saleability is not really an issue when applying, only superior image quality, I wouldn't worry about the marketability. Besides just because certain people on this site lack the imagination to see a use for an image doesn't mean there isn't one. If all you want are photos that sell 10000 times each you should re-think stock. It's as much about providing the unique (because you can never predict what a buyer might be looking for) as much as it is providing the same old S**t every other photographer does.


Ignore | Logged


CoisaX


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #3 on: October 16, 2011, 17:24 »

Why ISO 800, when You could shot 1/250 or less ( OS?) for 230mm?

I have some dragonly macros and birds, and believe me: The saleability is extremly low. one sale for each file and over.

Wasn't You that "worked" on sports and such things? Why not editorial?


Ignore | Logged


Xalanx


« Reply #4 on: October 16, 2011, 17:35 »

- image has so much noise, I doubt that it'll be accepted even in the less pretentious among the low earner agencies
- it is also shaken, that's why is blurry
- white balance is slightly off
- also, piece of advice: shoot and work in sRGB, not adobe rgb
- other piece of advice: resize images to the smalles possible, when uploading your first 3.

Here's my take on your image, this is how I would have submitted it. No noise, sharper, but you can still see that camera was shaken:
http://bit.ly/rlBQkC

quick 2 minutes work - remove noise (no plugin), resize, correct white balance, sharpen iguana's face. It's not perfect and saved at 70% quality, just to give you the idea.

I'll remove it after you look at it.

I'll also re-shoot this image.


LE: shortened the url.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2011, 02:47 by Xalanx »

Ignore | Logged


Envateo Photo ToolsMicrostock Insider
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
First Shutterstock Submission
Shutterstock.com
roman 8 1959 Last post December 18, 2006, 15:51
by Bateleur
First submission at SS « 1 2 »
Shutterstock.com
Magnum 28 4418 Last post May 16, 2008, 15:07
by trucic
critique this IS submission rejected « 1 2 »
Photo Critique
arquiplay77 34 4660 Last post January 24, 2009, 21:57
by goldenangel
Critique for iStock Submission Test
Photo Critique
tab62 11 1734 Last post July 16, 2011, 20:52
by Will Dutt
Istock submission image critique please
Photo Critique
vissnz 10 773 Last post April 21, 2012, 00:29
by Lagereek

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc