1
General Stock Discussion / Shutterstock select vs. Shutterstock.
« on: December 05, 2018, 11:20 »
The first link is straight from the contributor pushed as an example on shutter's front page as a 'select provider', so I'm taking the liberty to assume it represents the collection.
https://www.shutterstock.com/video/clip-1007931943-office-beautiful-accountant-works-on-laptop-smiles
https://www.shutterstock.com/video/clip-13949591-business-people-working-over-computer-modern-start
Can someone explain to me what justifies the first costing twice as the second? Just curious. Do they seriously expect the customers not to say "wait, what? why should I pay double for this?". Imho if anything the second clip is better stock and has more production value and nuance, but that's just imho... and that "HD included", is it just me, or isn't that bit too much of a cheap trick? Again, will customer not shake their heads on reading that? Even my mom can find some freebie tool to downsize vids.
https://www.shutterstock.com/video/clip-1007931943-office-beautiful-accountant-works-on-laptop-smiles
https://www.shutterstock.com/video/clip-13949591-business-people-working-over-computer-modern-start
Can someone explain to me what justifies the first costing twice as the second? Just curious. Do they seriously expect the customers not to say "wait, what? why should I pay double for this?". Imho if anything the second clip is better stock and has more production value and nuance, but that's just imho... and that "HD included", is it just me, or isn't that bit too much of a cheap trick? Again, will customer not shake their heads on reading that? Even my mom can find some freebie tool to downsize vids.