MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Fortunefame

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
LuckyOliver.com / Re: Comment on the Image Above Yours!
« on: October 23, 2007, 15:19 »
Hi guys, great thread! I'm just starting on LO and the comments between us is just awesome.

Here's another one from me :

http://www.luckyoliver.com/photo/4911037/horse_silhouettes_at_sunset

3
StockXpert.com / Re: F*** YOU StockXpert
« on: October 07, 2007, 01:53 »
i have good acceptance rates elsewhere between 60 and 94, so that can't be the problem i guess

well I just woke up and i'm less angry then yesterday evening:) i'm just nog going to bother with it any longer, StockXpert is nothing for me obviously

cheers

4
StockXpert.com / Extremely angry with StockXpert
« on: October 06, 2007, 17:52 »
I'm really angry so pardon my ranting:)

I sent over starting sept 14th until sept 29th each day different batches of 50 pictures, totalling about 7-800 pictures on at least 20 different themes. Now I just came home and was already desperately checking if they had possibly reviewed my pictures and YES THEY DID, but they rejected every single file, not one of them got approved!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This must be warm up for april fool's, I don't see another logical explanation!

I won't spent any second more on that rediculous site!

Thanks!

edit: changed subject name.

5
LuckyOliver.com / Re: itpc data
« on: October 04, 2007, 00:35 »
I didn't use any of those signs madelaide.

I did yes indeed, they're investigating this. They're really friendly yes in their emails.




7
LuckyOliver.com / Re: Comment on the Image Above Yours!
« on: October 03, 2007, 15:48 »
alright, i already have 3 pics online :-)

http://www.luckyoliver.com/photo/4669037/sunset_horse_silhouette

8
LuckyOliver.com / Re: itpc data
« on: October 03, 2007, 15:43 »
my god this is so annoying, really don't want to give a title to 600+ images

i have no special signs in the title so that can't be the problem i thing, it just surprises me that at every other site it works flawless


9
LuckyOliver.com / Re: itpc data
« on: October 03, 2007, 13:47 »
photoshop cs3

10
LuckyOliver.com / itpc data
« on: October 03, 2007, 13:24 »
Hi guys,

I recently started uploading on LO with my keywords, title & description already saved iin the iptc. The keywords and the description show up nicely, but the title remains unnamed... I never had this problem with all the other sites...

Any suggestions?

Thanks!

11
General Stock Discussion / Re: How much $$ in microstock in sept
« on: October 01, 2007, 14:34 »
363$

12
General - Top Sites / Re: September 2007 Earnings breakdown
« on: October 01, 2007, 00:32 »
      % growth   $ / DL   % total rev
Dreamstime   46,6%   $1,09   14,1%
Shutterstock   146%   $0,31   39,8%
Istock      109,3%   $0,73   14,2%
123RF      41,6%   $0,53   12,8%
Fotolia      25,9%   $0,85   15,8%
BigStockPhoto   -47,1%   $0,82   3,3%

Total      65,4%   $0,48   100,0%

BME everrrrrrrrr



13
StockXpert.com / Re: Subscription Coming Soon to StockXpert
« on: September 28, 2007, 12:26 »
you should better approve my pics from 3 weeks ago:)

14
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Microstockgroup Challenge - Eggs (september)
« on: September 05, 2007, 14:52 »
Hi Leaf!

Great challenge! I'm in! So to see if I get this ok. UPload to istock, after accepted adapt the description and add the link you provided us?

Cheers

15
General Stock Discussion / Buyer referral bonus
« on: June 27, 2007, 02:28 »
Hello all,

Do you know which site gives you the highest buyer referral bonus. I have 2 companies who are willing to buy a package for 500$. Could anyone sum up what you get where, because I can't seem to find it.

muchas gracias!

16
Shutterstock.com / Re: YAY! My first EL at SS....
« on: June 22, 2007, 02:29 »
congratz hatman!

OK, now I think i'm the only one who never had one for a year on all  the sites 8)

17
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia V.2
« on: June 19, 2007, 13:30 »
Today I have had my best day ever at fotolia and there's time for a few more yet :D

I confirm...triple the sales of a normal day...WOAHHHHH...sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet

18
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia V.2
« on: June 19, 2007, 02:35 »
I can't complain from FT either, they're my biggest seller. ALtough only +-30 pics of my 400+ pfolio sell on a daily basis.

I did request a payout the day before the server change...so I hope that didn't get lost in the mountain of work...:s

19
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia V.2
« on: June 17, 2007, 01:34 »
The stats option is pretty cool, so far so good
what stats? looks the same to me as before? no?

20
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia V.2
« on: June 15, 2007, 03:47 »
Seriously, this downtime during a week s*cks monkeyballs. Poor poor business planning...

21
Adobe Stock / Re: at long last......
« on: June 14, 2007, 05:05 »
and I was just in my best week!!! already 24$ (without an extended) which is HUGE for me:)

22
iStockPhoto.com / Buyer referral
« on: June 04, 2007, 02:50 »
Hello,

I can't seem to find it on their site but if I refer a buyer who buys a pack of credits, do I receive a certain percentage then for referring him?


Thanks!

Cheers

23
Shutterstock.com / Re: How's it going?
« on: May 30, 2007, 02:41 »
Not good,

For the first time i don't get the monthly payout. I'm 15$ short! I uploaded on the 1st of this month a batch of 40, sales were OK then, but 2 days ago I even had a 0 DL day...wow...

24
Off Topic / Re: Reviewer
« on: May 25, 2007, 09:09 »
Without knowing the the details to your rant, the question could also be what is the role of the reviewer.

IMO they should only check that there is no noise/ pixilation/logos/copyright/models/out of focus etc that the buyer cant see from a small preview.  Things like colour, the buyer can determine for themselves.

What do you mean by the role of the reviewer? Do you suggest that he could only be reviewing if there are logos on the pic or not? He says he's a reviewer so I guess he's doing the whole thing.

ANyway, I found it frustrating that an amateur gets to review our images.

Note: I'm not saying this because I had pics rejected:)

25
Off Topic / Reviewer
« on: May 25, 2007, 08:33 »
I just have to vent/rant for a bit. On xx there is a guy who has only 300photos in his folio, sold 100, exercises photography since October 2006, shoots with a simple bridge cam, if you judge his pics you see that he has absolutely NO knowledge about whitebalance vs overexposed AND HE GETS TO REVIEW THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS of our pictures.

I think this is totally unprofessional and not at all motivating for us contributors.

What do you guys think? Is my opinion too superficial or do you think that I'm right?

WHOAAAAAAAAAAA

Pages: [1] 2 3

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors