|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - scottdunlap
1
« on: March 27, 2023, 12:48 »
All strokes should be outlined. This is a standard requirement for submitted vectors at most (if not all) agencies. And yes, it reduces editability, but it prevents unintended issues with the artwork not being displayed correctly, when for instance resizing the artwork.
It's not a standard requirement. I upload to many agencies, and have for many years. Iconfinder, for example, does not require outlined strokes. I've also supplied icon sets (16+ icons) to Adobe with editable strokes.
Fully understand about the pros and cons of outlining, but as a designer I want to be able to edit and change the stroke weight, and have had many people ask for them to be supplied that way.
Adobe says here: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/vector-requirements.html
Follow these best practices:
- Outline all strokes as paths or shapes.
I don't know about Iconfinder and similar agencies, YMMV. Perhaps there are some exceptions, it could be agencies have loosened up their requirements over the years.
I do understand where you're coming from regarding editability, maybe simple icons are the exception to the rule.
Thanks, I missed that. It's weird though, it shows up as expected... and then after a few hours it changes. So it initially generates the preview as expected, then it does something to it. Who knows. If I don't hear from them I might just outline them.
2
« on: March 27, 2023, 08:39 »
All strokes should be outlined. This is a standard requirement for submitted vectors at most (if not all) agencies. And yes, it reduces editability, but it prevents unintended issues with the artwork not being displayed correctly, when for instance resizing the artwork.
It's not a standard requirement. I upload to many agencies, and have for many years. Iconfinder, for example, does not require outlined strokes. I've also supplied icon sets (16+ icons) to Adobe with editable strokes. Fully understand about the pros and cons of outlining, but as a designer I want to be able to edit and change the stroke weight, and have had many people ask for them to be supplied that way.
3
« on: March 27, 2023, 06:39 »
Adobe now recommends uploading single icons as SVG files, but there is a glitch happening when I do. After submitting, everything appears OK, but after some time, something behind the scenes messes with the file. The file includes editable strokes and it gets filled in and is a total mess... see attachments.
I could outline the strokes, but then the line weight can't be adjusted. I could submit AI files, but that's less useful for developers.
Contacted support twice, haven't heard back after 3 weeks.
Anyone else having issues, or ideas on what to do?
4
« on: September 25, 2018, 09:50 »
Nice surprise! Thank you.
5
« on: September 14, 2018, 06:14 »
Thanks for the update Mat. Has anything changed for contributors, or was it behind the scenes stuff?
6
« on: August 27, 2018, 11:13 »
Hey Mat, any idea when vector uploads will be back?
7
« on: September 25, 2017, 10:36 »
Yep, works in chrome. Thx for the workaround.
8
« on: September 18, 2017, 06:11 »
Yeah Jo Ann, it's happening for my sales. I didn't think to go to Fotolia as a back-up, I'll try that.
Good to know Sean, hopefully they work it out soon.
9
« on: September 17, 2017, 18:38 »
For about a month now, when I go to look at my latest downloads, it shows "Invalid Date" for the purchase date. Anyone else seeing this?
10
« on: August 04, 2014, 14:33 »
Thanks Shelma1, here are the royalty rates:
https://stockafe.com/appendix-a/
I find it sad that "Why bother?" seems to be my most asked question in stock. It's disappointing to constantly be underwhelmed by new offerings.
1- scottdunlap, where u r located ?
2 - i like 2 c some of the members' portfolios but cannot seem to do that.
I'm not affiliated with the site in any way, just came across it and thought I'd share.
12
« on: August 04, 2014, 11:47 »
Not sure what that test would be, but there's no information on the site at all about price, license, terms or anything else. If and when they make all of the nuts and bolts information available, I'll have a read.
There's a little bit of additional info if you click on community, and then look at tutorials and forum, but not much.
13
« on: August 04, 2014, 11:29 »
Saw an ad for a new site coming soon: https://stockafe.com/coming-soonThey are saying all the right things and it looks promising. And they have a budget, advertising on the Deck Network isn't cheap. Anyone have any info about royalty rates?
14
« on: March 17, 2014, 09:04 »
But why would iStock create a new landing page saying
"Explore millions of stock photos, vectors, videos and music clips you cant get from the other guys"
if they wanted or expected exclusives to leave?
It's like when drinks state "contains natural flavors," even if that amount is tiny. It's a selling point. iStock wants to have their cake and eat it too.
16
« on: November 04, 2013, 08:19 »
Stock Performer has up to date info. Funny (not really) that an outside group can get things right. I believe they offer a free trial, you could use it in the meantime to get your stats.
17
« on: February 07, 2013, 07:25 »
Anyone know if it's only photos? Or will there also be illustration, video, etc.
18
« on: November 14, 2012, 14:38 »
The decline stalled for me in October but has returned with a vengance this month. Holy smokes.
Feeling your pain brother! Started for me in September, but this month is really *.
19
« on: November 14, 2012, 14:32 »
My advice would be if you are going to drop exclusivity next year now is the time to start planning. eg. which sites you plan on submitting to, upload processes, is it possible to start uploading now, what prices will you set your files at etc. If i were you i would also have a bit of buffer money in the bank to help ease the change over.
Most importantly, start (re)keywording your images in the IPTC with an eye toward how keywording works on other sites. For example you will need synonyms and plurals added, which isn't necessary with the Istock CV.
Good suggestions. Luckily I only have 400 files, so it shouldn't be too painful. I'll probably poke around other sites, but I'm going to give it some time. For the last 5 years, this one included, iStock has been surprisingly consistent for me. My yearly totals don't fluctuate more than 10% or so. It's what happens in-between that's maddening! And I know that happens, but like I said, this one is bigger than usual. Fingers crossed it rebounds shortly.
20
« on: November 13, 2012, 20:30 »
I'm seeing a big drop also. Sept, Oct and Nov are way down. This month I am on track to make 1/2 of what I did last November (!)
I've seen ups and downs over the last 5 years, but not like this. Luckily I've socked away money knowing this might happen. I'm not going to stress with the holidays coming up, but will wait to see if there's the usual rebound early next year. If not, I will consider dropping exclusivity.
21
« on: September 20, 2012, 11:45 »
I am also way down. At this rate, I'd guess I'll make about 2/3 what a normal September would bring.
22
« on: March 09, 2012, 10:45 »
Wow, that's pretty blatant.
I like IStock's "abusive inspiration" policy.
"It may not be illegal but we don't like to see other artists work being cannibalized" is a good attitude in a stock agency, as long as it is fairly applied.
Is it?
I've never heard anyone complain about having images deleted unfairly under the policy. Plus their house their rules.
I try not to play the abusive inspiration card unless it's blatant. But there have been a few times it was really obvious and iStock has quickly removed the copy-cat work. I'm happy the policy is in place.
23
« on: March 03, 2012, 08:28 »
I wasn't calling you selfish Lisa. You're anything but. It just seemed from your original post you didn't get their explanation. Wasn't passing judgement, I haven't visited the site lately and I didn't even realize you were anonymous.
Oh, sorry Scott. Although I was replying to your post, I never did think you were saying the anonymous folks were selfish. You were just helpfully clarifying the policy.
I should have been clearer that it was the facebook post of the owners that I was offended by. Sort of the tone that anonymous people weren't pulling their weight.
I felt it was important to point out the legitimate reasons for anonymity, along with the fact that our stats are still available for comparison, just without names.
OK, good to hear. And I know first-hand about "inspiring" people, so I definitely get the reason for anonymity!
24
« on: March 02, 2012, 06:32 »
Well Christian, you have certainly livened up this thread and kept us all entertained 
- His personality is so magnetic, he is unable to carry credit cards.
- His words carry weight that would break a less interesting mans jaw.
- His blood smells like cologne.
- If he were to mail a letter without postage, it would still get there.
are these yours or did you borrow them? they are brilliant. I love your post
I wish I could take credit. As retrorocket said, it's an on-going and brilliant advertising campaign by Dos Equis beer. I thought it was world-wide, but maybe it's focused here in the states.
25
« on: March 01, 2012, 15:10 »
Just wait for it  . That being said, I'd like for this threads to turn for the better.
OK then, I'll do my part. I don't normally post numbers, but I had by far my best Feb every. Up 44% from last year.
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
