|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Jens G
26
« on: June 11, 2022, 00:54 »
I realize that it will probably be short-lived, but the old page (thankfully) is back.
I still have the new Earnings Summary page 
27
« on: May 29, 2022, 08:19 »
If your GPU is very old, it might not be compatible with PS. I had that problem with my laptop, but I found a way to force PS to use it anyway. You can try to making a .txt file called PSUserConfig.txt, containing the following: # Force GPU On GPUForce 1 And save it in [Installation Drive]:\Users\[User Name]\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\[Photoshop_version]\[Photoshop_version]Settings\ https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/kb/enable-optional-extensions-photoshop-cc.html
28
« on: May 27, 2022, 03:33 »
Why is it that often when they want to offer something new it is worse than the last version??
I know new things need some time to get used to, but with some things I know right away that I will never like them. In the old version every important info was visible at one glance. You could at once see how many videos or singles or ELs you had sold on a day. Now you have to navigate through dropdown menus and choose categories and file types to be able to see that. What kind of improvement is that?
I totally agree. If only it would remember my choices, so that I wouldn't have to select them every time.
29
« on: April 21, 2022, 02:09 »
This morning, it looks like the refunds I had, have been removed again.
30
« on: April 13, 2022, 05:37 »
Even though it's an old thread, it go me curious too.
So I made this chart, with data from 11 years.
October is a clear winner, but the differences are not that big.
31
« on: December 09, 2021, 11:03 »
I received payment on the 6th.
32
« on: August 22, 2021, 04:32 »
Do you think the sales numbers are lower via Wirestock, than than would have been if you used your own personal accounts at each agency?
Thanks to those of you who answered my question.
The reason for my question is that I'm considering deleting my files on SS, and upload them via WS instead. After a necessary wait of course.
But if the general feeling was that sales are worse via WS, I wouldn't do it.
For now, I think I will upload new files to WS, and by the end of the year see how they have done.
If you move your photos from SS to SS via WS you should have in mind:
As older your images, as more often they could be rejected now cause of the AI review process on SS.
With other words: Newer Images which passed via AI will be pass again. Rejected ones - as mentioned from others above - might get accepted now, because more accepted images via WS.
I luckily moved the most before the AI review and got most of them accepted again. My last batch - well they were indeed the worst ones in case of motifs not in kind of quality - most got accepted and some got sales directly and funny: also instant pay to SS (3.83$ each).
Thank you for the advice. I will keep that in mind 
33
« on: August 22, 2021, 02:35 »
Can't believe that people now love renting their images for $5 for whole year.. 12 months.. I'm not with Adobe but surely they don't accept images of anything and everything and the images accepted are reasonably quite good. Anyone who has experience with multiple stock agencies, would know that an image with zero sales in a site, can be the best seller in other site. But each to his own...
But thats why you can deselect the images that you don't want in the free section. I deselected lots of images. Not just the ones that are selling well on other sites, but also the ones that I felt were too good to give away for the price offered.
34
« on: August 22, 2021, 00:49 »
Do you think the sales numbers are lower via Wirestock, than than would have been if you used your own personal accounts at each agency?
Thanks to those of you who answered my question. The reason for my question is that I'm considering deleting my files on SS, and upload them via WS instead. After a necessary wait of course. But if the general feeling was that sales are worse via WS, I wouldn't do it. For now, I think I will upload new files to WS, and by the end of the year see how they have done.
35
« on: August 17, 2021, 08:46 »
Do you think the sales numbers are lower via Wirestock, than than would have been if you used your own personal accounts at each agency?
36
« on: June 16, 2021, 10:10 »
...
My files are still nominated. The problem is that the pages of the entire batch are not sorted by a certain criteria, each time the images are in different order and some images show up twice on different pages. Last nigh I double-checked all nominated ones and this morning I've found some bestsellers (also on other agencies) that escaped my vigilance and were still nominated.
I'll wait up and see what happens, I just hope not to give away some bestseller, by mistake.
Thanks for your help Mat.
I think that if you sort by Date, instead of by Downloads, it will keep the order through the pages.
37
« on: May 27, 2021, 14:15 »
I looked at all my sales from this year on Adobe to get some numbers to make sure I am not actually imagining things when I say that, in opposite to other agencies, new content does not sell on Adobe for me:
I had 1084 sales in 2021 so far. Only 8 (!) downloads were of images I submitted in 2021, so 0,74%.
My port has around 5700 images. Around 1200 were added in 2021, so 21% new images this year.
Yeah, I am pretty sure I am not imagining things.  And since this is an Adobe-only phenomenon I am quite sure it's not because I suddenly started submitting crappier or less useful images.
You just trigged me to check sales of new files in my port, because I also felt that new files don't sell.
The result is, to my surprise, that 6% of my sales in 2021 are from files uploaded in 2021.
And only 5% of my files are uploaded in 2021.
That's interesting, so a total different experience from mine. May I ask how many total downloads you had in 2020? Because if the number is very different, these two cases might not be so easily comparable.
The numbers are different. My port size is smaller than yours, and sales in 2021 also smaller. But number of sales from files uploaded in 2021 is higher than yours.
38
« on: May 27, 2021, 08:46 »
I looked at all my sales from this year on Adobe to get some numbers to make sure I am not actually imagining things when I say that, in opposite to other agencies, new content does not sell on Adobe for me:
I had 1084 sales in 2021 so far. Only 8 (!) downloads were of images I submitted in 2021, so 0,74%.
My port has around 5700 images. Around 1200 were added in 2021, so 21% new images this year.
Yeah, I am pretty sure I am not imagining things. And since this is an Adobe-only phenomenon I am quite sure it's not because I suddenly started submitting crappier or less useful images.
You just trigged me to check sales of new files in my port, because I also felt that new files don't sell. The result is, to my surprise, that 6% of my sales in 2021 are from files uploaded in 2021. And only 5% of my files are uploaded in 2021.
39
« on: May 13, 2021, 04:12 »
I think SS is rewarding contributors in search after upload rate.
The more uploads in a period, the higher ranking.
This could be the reason and a plausible guess.
Do we know a concrete proof, not just for ss but also for other stock companies?
The reason for my guess is that SS already showed that it's the present number of downloads that gets rewarded, when they introduced the new earnings structure. So I guess that they also want to reward contributors with high upload activity, and one way could be to rank them higher in search.
40
« on: May 06, 2021, 10:25 »
I think SS is rewarding contributors in search after upload rate.
The more uploads in a period, the higher ranking.
41
« on: May 02, 2021, 06:13 »
I made 78% less on SS in april 2021 than april 2020.
And 30% more on Adobe in april 2021 than april 2020.
42
« on: April 25, 2021, 10:00 »
Maybe it's because a lot of people look at his portfolio?
I looked at it too, and also find it strange that for example a photo of a camel on his last page, when sorted after popularity, show up as number one when I search for camel at SS.
43
« on: March 04, 2021, 09:42 »
I don't think the payment has ever come this early in the month for me before. SS must have decided to do something to get a positive reaction, for a change 
44
« on: February 15, 2021, 15:55 »
I just checked my tax form at SS.
It was approved january 2018, and according to the FAQ valid for 3 years. So it expired january 2021.
Maybe that explains why I haven't been payed yet in february? There has not been any notification from SS about the expired tax form, even though the FAQ say they will notify.
I have filled out a new tax form now, and it has been approved.
45
« on: February 10, 2021, 10:09 »
They probably can't afford to pay us 
46
« on: February 05, 2021, 09:55 »
Wonderful  Next payment February 10th 2022
47
« on: February 01, 2021, 11:52 »
For me number of sales ended up almost the same as january 2020. But earnings were 72% lower than january 2020, and 60% lower than they would have been with the old earning structure
48
« on: January 26, 2021, 09:31 »
I noticed that there are fewer of those too. Don't know if it's a coincidence.
49
« on: January 22, 2021, 10:02 »
I just uploaded via FTP, and the files showed up in "Unfinished Files" within 30 minutes.
50
« on: January 22, 2021, 05:47 »
My december 2020 total was 10% lower than 2019 total.
For SS so far, january 2021 is 65% lower than it would have been with the old earnings structure. And it's 85% lower than january 2020. But the month isn't over yet, so it will probably end at about 80% lower than january 2020.
It is going to be the first month ever, where I make less on SS than on AS.
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
