pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: $75 sensitive use?  (Read 3994 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: December 24, 2012, 09:11 »
0
anyone know of anything else apart from sensitive use that gives a $75 commission on SS?

Not complaining one bit but I have what appears to be a sensitive use licence on an illustration of chocolate :D


« Reply #1 on: December 24, 2012, 10:08 »
0
There must be other licences than sensitive, because I had one of these fat ones of a golden retriever.

steheap

  • Author of best selling "Get Started in Stock"

« Reply #2 on: December 24, 2012, 10:27 »
0
And I had a $90 download for an image of my cat!

Steve

RacePhoto

« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2012, 10:29 »
0
There must be other licences than sensitive, because I had one of these fat ones of a golden retriever.

Maybe the retriever is a feeling loving kind sensitive dog and cares about how it's image is used? How would you like your photo on a heart worms medication advertisement?  ;)

Cats are confused, but "feeling";D

Yeah, I'd love one of those $75 sales. But instead I'll take my steady trickle of subs and be happy.

« Reply #4 on: December 24, 2012, 10:48 »
0
The Individual Image Licenses can include an option for Sensitive Use but that doesn't automatically mean they are being used in that way. Here's a link to a Shutterbuzz post about the subject http://www.shutterstock.com/buzz/individual-image-licenses-update
Kind regards, David.

Edit to fix wonky link (I hope!)
« Last Edit: December 24, 2012, 10:51 by Newsfocus1 »

steheap

  • Author of best selling "Get Started in Stock"

« Reply #5 on: December 24, 2012, 11:29 »
0
Quote
Cats are confused, but "feeling"? 


It looks kinda sad:



Could be some new anti depressant drug for pets?

Steve

« Reply #6 on: December 24, 2012, 16:17 »
+1
Clearly, they bought the cat to make a composite with the dress-up sunglasses I sold a sensitive or "other" license for:



With apologies to Steve Heap's lovely cat :)

« Reply #7 on: December 24, 2012, 19:52 »
0
 ;D

steheap

  • Author of best selling "Get Started in Stock"

« Reply #8 on: December 24, 2012, 22:01 »
0
Very nice! I'll have to try some shots with a pair of glasses!

Steve

tab62

« Reply #9 on: December 25, 2012, 00:04 »
0
haven't you learn what happen to Yuri with those sunglasses  :D



« Reply #10 on: December 25, 2012, 01:50 »
0
I also had a $75 single download for this image:

http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=61142929

I don't understand how "sensitive use" can apply to that particular image, but I am not complaining about the $75. On that particular day (17/12/2012) I had no less than 6 single downloads for large amounts, though not all of them $75. 

tab62

« Reply #11 on: December 25, 2012, 02:12 »
0
someday I will get one- someday

w7lwi

  • Those that don't stand up to evil enable evil.
« Reply #12 on: December 25, 2012, 12:44 »
+1
I also had a $75 single download for this image:

http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=61142929

I don't understand how "sensitive use" can apply to that particular image, but I am not complaining about the $75. On that particular day (17/12/2012) I had no less than 6 single downloads for large amounts, though not all of them $75.


An SOD sale does not mean a sensitive use application.  SOD stands for Single On Demand.  That is, it's a single image sale that Shutterstock has negotiated a special price with the buyer, usually large, high volume agencies and the like.  Sensitive use images fall under this type of sale, but so do any other type of images that the buyer has a particular need for that fall outside of the other pricing venues that SS offers.  I've had several sales of this sort, the highest being $112, but several in the $75-$90 range.  None of them could even remotely be considered for sensitive use.

Microstock Man

  • microstockman.com

« Reply #13 on: December 26, 2012, 20:48 »
0
I also had a $75 single download for this image:

http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=61142929

I don't understand how "sensitive use" can apply to that particular image, but I am not complaining about the $75. On that particular day (17/12/2012) I had no less than 6 single downloads for large amounts, though not all of them $75.


Really nice port Eco, love the wildlife shots. :)

« Reply #14 on: December 27, 2012, 05:13 »
0
Thank you for the kind words Microstock Man


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
2 Replies
1790 Views
Last post February 15, 2008, 20:42
by Pixart
4 Replies
1913 Views
Last post July 27, 2012, 14:14
by ShadySue
3 Replies
1004 Views
Last post June 02, 2013, 01:47
by Pauws99
13 Replies
8329 Views
Last post September 21, 2013, 05:41
by ShadySue
2 Replies
1500 Views
Last post November 18, 2013, 12:02
by imagesbykenny

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors