MicrostockGroup
Agency Based Discussion => Shutterstock.com => Topic started by: arapix on December 21, 2016, 15:39
-
Hello,
It's first time for me to submit editorial vector.
I have read the rules. and I thought it's simple as usual, but my editorial vector is rejected for 3 times now :(
My vector is collection of social icons (facebook , twitter, linkedin, googlePlus , etc. )
First Time :
Editorial Vector / Illustration Requirements -- Image does not meet our requirements for editorial vector/illustration submissions.
Intellectual Property -- Image potentially infringes on another party’s intellectual property rights (e.g., someone else’s artwork is visible in the image or an object's design is protected by copyright).
* this time i reviewd the editorial submission rules sand I found out that I forgot to add “illustrative editorial” in the keywordds
Second Time :
Intellectual Property -- Image potentially infringes on another party’s intellectual property rights (e.g., someone else’s artwork is visible in the image or an object's design is protected by copyright).
* I really not sure what was the wrong , but I decided to re-submit it with very carful
Third Time :
Non-Licensable Content -- Due to legal compliance restrictions, we cannot license this content in our collection.
* I really don't understand what is that . I've searched about this rejection reason but I didn't find anything !
Please advice
-
Whatever the subject is, SS clearly doesn't think it is legal to license it. They may be overly conservative, but that is their right - their game, their rules. My advice is to give up and do vectors on another subject. Good luck!
-
did you tick the editorial box when submitting the vector?
-
To me, all 3 reasons are the same, just different wording.
-
did you tick the editorial box when submitting the vector?
Yes I did .
Whatever the subject is, SS clearly doesn't think it is legal to license it. They may be overly conservative, but that is their right - their game, their rules. My advice is to give up and do vectors on another subject. Good luck!
this is really bad :(
It was good one
Thanks anyway
-
there are a million of these photos and vectors on ss why should they reject this one?
-
there are a million of these photos and vectors on ss why should they reject this one?
This is what I wish to know.
I am new with Editorial . I wish to know what is the wrong I did
-
Hello,
It's first time for me to submit editorial vector.
I have read the rules. and I thought it's simple as usual, but my editorial vector is rejected for 3 times now :(
My vector is collection of social icons (facebook , twitter, linkedin, googlePlus , etc. )
First Time :
Editorial Vector / Illustration Requirements -- Image does not meet our requirements for editorial vector/illustration submissions.
Intellectual Property -- Image potentially infringes on another party’s intellectual property rights (e.g., someone else’s artwork is visible in the image or an object's design is protected by copyright).
* this time i reviewd the editorial submission rules sand I found out that I forgot to add “illustrative editorial” in the keywordds
Second Time :
Intellectual Property -- Image potentially infringes on another party’s intellectual property rights (e.g., someone else’s artwork is visible in the image or an object's design is protected by copyright).
* I really not sure what was the wrong , but I decided to re-submit it with very carful
Third Time :
Non-Licensable Content -- Due to legal compliance restrictions, we cannot license this content in our collection.
* I really don't understand what is that . I've searched about this rejection reason but I didn't find anything !
Please advice
They will unlikely accept this kind of content.
It's funny that Shutterstock is accepting editorial videos of some brand logos like sign boards and rejecting photos of them. Try uploading them to Dreamstime, Depositphotos and 123rf instead.
-
They will unlikely accept this kind of content.
It's funny that Shutterstock is accepting editorial videos of some brand logos like sign boards and rejecting photos of them. Try uploading them to Dreamstime, Depositphotos and 123rf instead.
Yes , Dreamstime accepted it.
https://www.dreamstime.com/editorial-stock-photo-new-year-social-media-icons-illustration-vector-eps-alexandria-egypt-december-image82737198 (https://www.dreamstime.com/editorial-stock-photo-new-year-social-media-icons-illustration-vector-eps-alexandria-egypt-december-image82737198)
but in fact SS is my best selling agency
But why you say that SS rejecting this kind of photos ?
I see thousands of social icons logos on SS !
-
They will unlikely accept this kind of content.
It's funny that Shutterstock is accepting editorial videos of some brand logos like sign boards and rejecting photos of them. Try uploading them to Dreamstime, Depositphotos and 123rf instead.
Yes , Dreamstime accepted it.
https://www.dreamstime.com/editorial-stock-photo-new-year-social-media-icons-illustration-vector-eps-alexandria-egypt-december-image82737198 (https://www.dreamstime.com/editorial-stock-photo-new-year-social-media-icons-illustration-vector-eps-alexandria-egypt-december-image82737198)
but in fact SS is my best selling agency
But why you say that SS rejecting this kind of photos ?
I see thousands of social icons logos on SS !
We tried to upload some editorial photos of brands, they all were rejected with the third reason mentioned by you. I don't know exact reason. Some increased legal issues probably. You might be seeing some old ones.
-
this is no different from what he does
https://www.shutterstock.com/pic-535901248/stock-photo-kiev-ukraine-december-10-2016-collection-of-different-popular-social-media-icons-printed-on-white-paper-facebook-instagram-linkedin-pinterest-twitter-youtube.html (https://www.shutterstock.com/pic-535901248/stock-photo-kiev-ukraine-december-10-2016-collection-of-different-popular-social-media-icons-printed-on-white-paper-facebook-instagram-linkedin-pinterest-twitter-youtube.html)
-
SS no longer accept printed and scanned logos, any kind of logos in vector.
Whatever can be protected by copyright - vector coca-cola shape, vector polaroid and so on
-
this is no different from what he does
https://www.shutterstock.com/pic-535901248/stock-photo-kiev-ukraine-december-10-2016-collection-of-different-popular-social-media-icons-printed-on-white-paper-facebook-instagram-linkedin-pinterest-twitter-youtube.html (https://www.shutterstock.com/pic-535901248/stock-photo-kiev-ukraine-december-10-2016-collection-of-different-popular-social-media-icons-printed-on-white-paper-facebook-instagram-linkedin-pinterest-twitter-youtube.html)
According the new policy SS should delete it. You can ask SS support
-
ill let you ask them
i thought the illustrative editorial category they launched a few years back was exactly for that stuff
probably because creating a vector from a scan is the act of actually copying a logo, a photo of a logo is not that
-
I found out something may be I did wrong .
As mentioned in Shutterstock Editorial Guide
Finally, illustrative editorial images should include the keyword “illustrative editorial”. This will help customers locate these types of images.
I submitted “illustrative editorial” as one keyword.
I think it was wrong , and they are 2 keywords.
I tried submitting again after fixing this , and lets see :)
-
Check this article
http://www.shutterstock.com/blog/submitting-editorial-content-part-1-illustrative-editorial (http://www.shutterstock.com/blog/submitting-editorial-content-part-1-illustrative-editorial)
Isolated Brand Names or Logos
We no longer accept photographs that isolate a brand name or logo. (For example: an extremely tight shot of a logo on a product, an isolated logo printed on a paper, etc.)
-
this is no different from what he does
https://www.shutterstock.com/pic-535901248/stock-photo-kiev-ukraine-december-10-2016-collection-of-different-popular-social-media-icons-printed-on-white-paper-facebook-instagram-linkedin-pinterest-twitter-youtube.html (https://www.shutterstock.com/pic-535901248/stock-photo-kiev-ukraine-december-10-2016-collection-of-different-popular-social-media-icons-printed-on-white-paper-facebook-instagram-linkedin-pinterest-twitter-youtube.html)
According the new policy SS should delete it. You can ask SS support
They do not accept logos exept social media like in this image. Ypu can use sosial media logos in your design.