MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Altered Editorial Rejection - but they have not been altered!  (Read 564 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

« on: January 08, 2017, 14:58 »
0
Hi everyone, I was just wondering if anybody had had this situation?
I submitted some editorial product/still life shots and they were rejected as 'Altered Editorial' - which of course isn't allowed. However, I did not alter the images at all!  Is there any way of re-submitting the images and attaching a typed note to the reviewer?
Chris.


« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2017, 15:01 »
0
...by the way I have submitted many other editorial product shots in the past of other items and have never had this rejection reason before.

« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2017, 21:56 »
0
I assume you got a new reviewer who doesn't understand their "illustrative editorial" category.  You could always write to support, but I would just wait a day or two and resubmit.

« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2017, 03:42 »
0
If you feel that you are 100% right resubmit it, and pass to something else

« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2017, 02:23 »
0
Re-check your editorial captions and rewrite them if necessary, then resubmit. If you write to support, it will just take time. I would not do it before 1-2 resubmissions.

« Reply #5 on: January 10, 2017, 11:06 »
0
Thanks everyone.  I re-submitted and they were approved within a few hours.  It must have been a reviewer not knowing what he or she were doing!


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
4 Replies
2254 Views
Last post September 26, 2009, 11:53
by HermanM
7 Replies
1790 Views
Last post June 21, 2010, 23:49
by Phil
10 Replies
2837 Views
Last post July 14, 2010, 15:12
by WarrenPrice
10 Replies
1511 Views
Last post October 31, 2015, 17:19
by etudiante_rapide
3 Replies
262 Views
Last post January 02, 2017, 18:41
by unnonimus

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors