Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2012, 05:05

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] Print

Topic: Are you experiencing MASS REJECTIONS?  

(Read 13809 times)
CoisaX


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #175 on: August 09, 2011, 04:16 »

Hmm, strangely, my last batchs are being accept by SS with a good rating, and full rejected by 123RF, Fotolia. IS is more likely 50% rejected.

For that reason i still prefer keep my work with more than one agency, because i never know which one will want a particular batch.


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
briciola


« Reply #176 on: August 09, 2011, 04:24 »

Having not uploaded for a while I was pleasantly surprised that most of my last batch made it through - after reading this thread I fully expected 100% rejection.  Uploading at the weekend seems to be the way to go Smiley


Ignore | Logged


Slovenian


« Reply #177 on: August 09, 2011, 15:35 »

This is really becoming a pain in the ass, I've had my last series accepted elsewhere but got them all accept one rejected twice today at SS  Lips sealed

Logged


littleny


« Reply #178 on: August 09, 2011, 19:00 »

i get mass rejections and then resubmit with minor adjustments and usually have success.  i think SS problem is huge inconsistencies with their reviewers.  it is a pain in the ass; doing double the work to get an image through.   what irks me most is i have several images that i've been persistent about getting in my port so i kept submitting until they were accepted and they happen to be my best sellers.  soooo what.  would be nice to think the reviewers had a better eye then me, just a beginner but apparently in all cases they dont.


Ignore | Logged


Slovenian


« Reply #179 on: August 10, 2011, 03:37 »

i get mass rejections and then resubmit with minor adjustments and usually have success.  i think SS problem is huge inconsistencies with their reviewers.  it is a pain in the ass; doing double the work to get an image through.   what irks me most is i have several images that i've been persistent about getting in my port so i kept submitting until they were accepted and they happen to be my best sellers.  soooo what.  would be nice to think the reviewers had a better eye then me, just a beginner but apparently in all cases they dont.

That's exactly what I'm gonna do with this batch, I'm gonna keep them sending over and over a few times a day until all get accepted. I really don't care, I know they are the best healthy lifestyle photos I've ever made and I can really be stubborn. They're gonna have so much more work because of that.

Logged


Perry



« Reply #180 on: August 10, 2011, 04:47 »

I submitted a batch of images where the important part of the image had a carefully placed spotlight. The rest of the image was also lit, so nothing was too black. 100% rejected for "Poor Lighting--Poor or uneven lighting, or shadows. White balance may be incorrect."


Ignore | Logged


Slovenian


« Reply #181 on: August 10, 2011, 05:11 »

I submitted a batch of images where the important part of the image had a carefully placed spotlight. The rest of the image was also lit, so nothing was too black. 100% rejected for "Poor Lighting--Poor or uneven lighting, or shadows. White balance may be incorrect."

Got the same rejection over and over for natural, "sunset" lighting, really nice warm colors and it was more or less evenly lit as well (not even close enough to being really uneven). Notes to editors didn't help, I wonder if the system is automated, looks like nobody reads them (at least they could redirect those to real ppl if that's the case)

Logged


Mr Korn Flakes


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #182 on: August 10, 2011, 05:40 »

I think SS is accepting only bright photos, and that's pretty discouraging!


Ignore | Logged


littleny


« Reply #183 on: August 10, 2011, 09:51 »

Quote
I can really be stubborn. They're gonna have so much more work because of that.
thats an interesting point


Ignore | Logged


heywoody


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #184 on: August 10, 2011, 11:53 »

Quote
I can really be stubborn. They're gonna have so much more work because of that.
thats an interesting point
On the other hand, they are clearly aren't noticing that the same images are being submitted again, if they do will they not take some form of action?


Ignore | Logged


Slovenian


« Reply #185 on: August 10, 2011, 12:00 »

Quote
I can really be stubborn. They're gonna have so much more work because of that.
thats an interesting point
On the other hand, they are clearly aren't noticing that the same images are being submitted again, if they do will they not take some form of action?

Dunno, but I sure won't be denied from having photos online that are meeting ALL of their technical requirements and are also good (composition, concept, model etc). I mean it's absurd, they got accepted at ALL of the other agencies,  only IS rejected 2/14, other agencies accepted the whole series.
« Last Edit: August 10, 2011, 12:02 by Slovenian »
Logged


Envateo Photo ToolsMicrostock Insider
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
A Critical Mass
General Stock Discussion
Graffoto 20 2816 Last post March 25, 2008, 02:13
by Peter
Mass rejections at StockXpert
StockXpert.com
Freedom 19 2930 Last post August 14, 2008, 11:46
by dnavarrojr
Mass rejections from 123rf...
123RF
Peter 1 1190 Last post July 10, 2008, 15:38
by CofkoCof
According to the poll, SS sales down. How many of you are experiencing it? « 1 2 »
Shutterstock.com
wut 29 1352 Last post February 12, 2012, 11:32
by Artemis
Anyone experiencing this on Yay?
Yaymicro
Cricket 9 523 Last post March 16, 2012, 04:22
by Druid

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc