MicrostockGroup.com

If it helps;

Shutterstock Images LLC.
 155 W. 19th St., 2Fl
 NY NY 10011

 1-866-663-3954

By Fax
1-347-402-0710

Wow...that's awful!

Hmmm... sounds like a very tall story to me.  Shutterstock are reasonable and professional people; they don't close accounts without good reason.

Typically, guy pops up from nowhere claiming he was 'got at' unfairly; usually in such cases there is much more to the story.

Guys, I have asked them I don't know how many times for them to show me the photo that was not created by me.  They WILL NOT SHOW ME.  I had 400 photos in my portfolio and sold ~2,500 images each month.  I do this to pay tuition for my schooling.

There is nothing else to the story.  I have read their terms of service and nowhere does it mention they have the right to take back earnings from submitters.

They banned me from the forums also.  I would appreciate if anybody could help me find out what's going on - and ask an admin on the SS forums.  I was under the same name there. Crashoran

I won't be the judge of anyone here, but this seems to be the story:

You have, with or without knowing it, copied or made identical icons to another user named sodafish. I haven't seen the icons, so I have no idea. The only way for you to clear up the mess, would be to contact admin at SS directly, preferably by phone, and very, very politely.

I've had a look at your portfolio at DT and IS, and if it's legit, you're work is excellent. Still, getting too inspired by others when it comes to vector graphics is not a good idea. I do vectors myself, and know that it's not always easy to see what's inspiration and what's copying.

You can be pretty sure that SS is one safe legal ground when it comes to money. They don't like to take chances (which they showed when they banned you). A piece of advice: go through your other portfolios, and be 100% sure that you have no conflicts coming up there as well.

Good luck.

I haven't seen any of the icons in question. It was a claim by Helix7 in a post on 17 December after someone commented that your portfolio was empty.

If what you are saying in your latest post is true, SS is on thin ice here. Firstly, a photo with a copyrighted design should never have been approved by them in the first place, secondly, it's relatively easy to document if a photo has been taken by another person, particularly if the EXIF is intact. Do you still not know what photo they are talking about?

He didn't talk about his own portfolio, but the icons of sodafish. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

I'll post a few questions at the SS forum, and see what kind of responses I get. Hope they don't ban me then   

Wow... that was fast. Oh well, they are probably reading this thread anyway.

I'll leave it for now. Give some feedback when they have reached a conclusion. Could be interesting to hear what's behind all this.

Sorry hatman can't agree with that - I do not call people professional if they never reply to support inquiries. I emailed support multiple times, tried to PM admins on reviews issues, I never got any reply. Either they have a problem with their support email, or they simply ignore emails from contributors. In any case, professional this is not.
I don't know what the story is here, but the contributor definitely deserved a better explanation, as do all of us by the way. If they post something here or on their forum explaining the incident and show us the photos/images in question, then I'll call them professional.
But my impression about them is they don't care about individual contributors at all.... like 'we'll have people submitting to us no matter what we do".

Update:

Here is the email I sent last night

"Seth,

That email was not sent to me on December 19.  Please respond to each statement I have numbered.

1. Shutterstock never showed or told me which specific photos that I had allegedly stolen, therefore I never got a chance to show my side of the claim.  The e-mail wanted to hear my side of the claim, I responded, and never heard back.  This is in violation of my rights as a submitter according to your own terms of service.

2. Please SHOW ME which images I submitted that were not created by me.

3. Furthermore, I will need my earnings from this month sent to my PayPal address at *********@gmail.com"

Here is their response:

"Hello Nick,

This issue was handled by the head of the review department who is no longer with us.  I cannot deal with this matter any further.  The email WAS sent to you on December 19, though you may not have received it for whatever reason.

I have been notified that this case is closed."



I find it highly coincidental that the head of review person just now happened to no longer work for them.  All I want is an explanation.  Shutterstock will not answer the questions in the email, will not cooperate with me, or even return my phone calls.  I have lost faith in shutterstock, and what they are doing is a little something called internet fraud by taking my earnings.  They will receive notification concerning my remaining earnings through a small claims lawsuit. 

Yikes!!! Cashoran, please keep us posted on this. If that "professional" email you posted would be the last thing you hear from them, that is scary stuff!!! Basically telling you to bugger off without any reasonable explanation. If they don't show you the images that they think you copied and don't let you defend yourself (what if the accuser stole your images and decided to get rid of the competition??) then ya I'd take them to court too.
About technical support - they may have decent technical guys dealing with connectivity issues etc, but anything related to content.... what can I say can be much much better.