Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2012, 05:14

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print

Topic: Editorial Question  

(Read 675 times)
Pixart


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« on: April 02, 2010, 12:45 »

An editorial photograph was recently removed "per Legal".

We have removed the following images that you uploaded.
Royal Canadian Mounted Police Musical Ride (15312817) deleted because: Quality
Control - Deleted per Legal, "RCMP" is protected.


Does that mean the word RCMP is protected?  Can't we use words like RCMP and IPOD etc. in editorial labels and keywords?

Once again I am confused about what editorial really means.  Certainly their uniform would be copyrighted, and they have likely protected their name, but you see photos of the musical ride in the paper every time they perform.  I know the army is pretty fussy about what photos are allowed, but this photo does not jeopordize national security in any way, it was at a public event and the tickets did not have restrictions on photographs.

Do you think they deleted correctly, or did they perhaps delete not realizing it was editorial?


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
willie


« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2010, 12:58 »

If I am not mistaken, RCMP images are distributed by their own press . It's like the Canadian Snow Birds, you cannot sell them as stock.  That's as far as I am told by my colleagues .
But to be more correctly informed, you can easily check directly with the RCMP Public Relations .


Ignore | Logged


WarrenPrice

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2010, 13:31 »

There are a few regulations concerning publishing images of law enforcement and the military.  That may be the reason for your conflict?


Ignore | Logged


patrick1958
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2010, 14:07 »

There are a few regulations concerning publishing images of law enforcement and the military.  That may be the reason for your conflict?

It's actually the uniform... not allowed royalty or editorial.. so is the canadian flag.

Patrick.


Ignore | Logged


ShadySue
« Reply #4 on: April 04, 2010, 08:11 »

There are a few regulations concerning publishing images of law enforcement and the military.  That may be the reason for your conflict?

It's actually the uniform... not allowed royalty or editorial.. so is the canadian flag.

Patrick.
Yikes! Guess no-one has told iStock!


Ignore | Logged


Microstock InsiderEnvateo Photo Tools
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
editorial?
Photo Critique
oboy 4 1504 Last post July 08, 2008, 16:05
by oboy
Question about RM, editorial use of a trademarked item
General Macrostock
madelaide 0 851 Last post October 27, 2009, 20:09
by madelaide
A question about image reviews....not a complaint, just a question
General Stock Discussion
ajalbert 9 1370 Last post February 15, 2010, 15:24
by donding
Extended licence / editorial question
Shutterstock.com
Ryme 2 591 Last post September 04, 2010, 11:30
by FD
Editorial keyword question
General Stock Discussion
ShadySue 0 294 Last post July 18, 2011, 07:25
by ShadySue

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc