MicrostockGroup
Agency Based Discussion => Shutterstock.com => Topic started by: JetCityImage on August 06, 2018, 14:42
-
Is someone asking for these changes or are they rolling the fuzzy "If it works, let's fix it" dice...
-
What . is the point of "recently reviewed" ?!
Rejected had a use (although SS dont seem to reject anything at all now).
I cant see why i'd ever need to know the number of images i had reviewed in a 3 week period.
-
Another shiny turd from SS. ;D
I don't care about recently reviewed I can see what was accepted by looking at my portfolio.
Where do they find these people from? :o
-
The review staff at SS should all be let go along with there Bosses. It is a Joke....Period. Myself and a few friends are collecting a Bunch Of Ports that are embarrassing to say the least to present at some point. From downright Soft core SMUT to the worst form of spam ever conceived that got approved and that there not going to do a thing about it..
-
Exciting new features 8)
-
If it were divided into batches there would be some point. But that's not going to happen as if I recall correctly thats how it started before the various "improvements" and I can't remember anyone having a problem with that.
-
Another pointless waste of screen space, they never listen to contributors so it's there to stay. As has been said, at least rejected files had a use. What's next, a reviewer's favourite colour!
-
Just thought about it and realised it's the only way I can see my port as the other links hit a 404!
Also, why is there a large image after several small thumbnails?