MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: review time up at SS  (Read 4516 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #25 on: May 16, 2013, 07:14 »
0
I just got a batch accepted (20 images) in 7 days....* near to the hour of 7 days ago too!


Poncke v2

« Reply #26 on: May 16, 2013, 09:38 »
0
Imagin, I am not sure what you are trying to prove here, but I quoted directly from SS, and then you go on proving my earlier statement. Seems you are out for a fight, which makes you a troll.

« Reply #27 on: May 17, 2013, 04:00 »
+2
I am talking about emails which they send to people to confirm that they received the upload. That was obvious right from my 1st message. Even too obvious, so I don't know what are you trying to do here. Surely not anything constructive.
If you really just misunderstood my message, you could just check or ask instead of posting your smartass reply.
So it's ironic that you call me a troll, because this "discussion" seems like your pathetic trolling attempt (or maybe just the lack of basic manners?). In either case, this kind of forum shouldn't be the place for these stuff, so I won't spend anymore my keyboard on somebody like you.
And I definitely won't give you back a minus - degrading myself to your level would be quite terrible.

cheers

Poncke v2

« Reply #28 on: May 17, 2013, 05:43 »
-2
Have you actually read what you wrote in your first comment, you dont even mention that you are talking about an email. And you were talking about 72 hours, which is the processing time and not the review time.  I corrected you and then you became nasty and started throwing out insults. And yet you seem to think my level is degrading.

Striving

  • Stand up for what is right
« Reply #29 on: July 03, 2013, 09:29 »
0
It's not just you. I'm getting almost 1 day turn-around. Amazing! I'm so used to the queue being stuck for 2 weeks.  8)

Did the review time go up at SS this week?
Have some in the queue since Thu (?) last week or so.
Just would like to know if it just me  ;)

Thanks.

« Reply #30 on: July 03, 2013, 16:50 »
+2
Mine got reviewed faster than expected and rejected faster than expected. Sure, maybe some deserved it, but isolated objects with almost no blank space around them rejected for composition? Silhouettes rejected for lighting? I wonder if this is courtesy of some new software?

It is a shame because it almost seemed like new images might be selling again.

Uncle Pete

  • Evidence please...

« Reply #31 on: July 04, 2013, 00:35 »
0
Strange!

Mine got reviewed faster than expected and rejected faster than expected. Sure, maybe some deserved it, but isolated objects with almost no blank space around them rejected for composition? Silhouettes rejected for lighting? I wonder if this is courtesy of some new software?

It is a shame because it almost seemed like new images might be selling again.

« Reply #32 on: July 04, 2013, 04:54 »
0
Mine got reviewed faster than expected and rejected faster than expected. Sure, maybe some deserved it, but isolated objects with almost no blank space around them rejected for composition? Silhouettes rejected for lighting? I wonder if this is courtesy of some new software?

It is a shame because it almost seemed like new images might be selling again.

There may be reason for this. 132,156 new stock images added this week.
Since review time has corrected now due to which a huge number of files are now coming online now per week. By rejecting images they are now looking for better quality so that they can maintain their per week ratio.

ruxpriencdiam

  • Location. Third stone from the sun
« Reply #33 on: July 04, 2013, 09:29 »
-1
I thought that all the reviewers knew that "ISOLATED ON WHITE" does not get rejected for composition!!!!!

Someone taught that reviewer wrong and is still around I see!!!!

« Reply #34 on: July 04, 2013, 13:42 »
0
I thought that all the reviewers knew that "ISOLATED ON WHITE" does not get rejected for composition!!!!!

Someone taught that reviewer wrong and is still around I see!!!!

Dunno, suppose you have something isolated on white and there is a ton of white but very little something?

« Reply #35 on: July 04, 2013, 14:37 »
0
Or a white cube isolated on a white background in a snowstorm?

Ron

« Reply #36 on: July 05, 2013, 01:48 »
-1
I thought that all the reviewers knew that "ISOLATED ON WHITE" does not get rejected for composition!!!!!

Someone taught that reviewer wrong and is still around I see!!!!

Dunno, suppose you have something isolated on white and there is a ton of white but very little something?
Agree, there also could be composition errors on how the subject is photographed, like the angle for example. Or important stuff cropped off like a limb.

Microstock InsiderPhotoDune

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
0 Replies
786 Views
Last post October 12, 2009, 18:09
by melastmohican
18 Replies
4743 Views
Last post July 28, 2010, 02:56
by thaimacky
Review time

Started by bobkeenan « 1 2  All » Veer

35 Replies
7019 Views
Last post September 30, 2010, 19:47
by Amanda_K
15 Replies
2269 Views
Last post December 22, 2010, 14:31
by donding
9 Replies
2687 Views
Last post February 25, 2011, 16:19
by ShadySue

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors