pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: SS 2016 Review  (Read 9477 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

gyllens

« Reply #25 on: January 02, 2017, 06:06 »
+3
angelawaye! 

SS going down the tube yes you could say that again. Pop over to the SS forum and you see the only ones who are happy are either new members or 0.25 members. I used to make payouts in half a day before December 2016 which went right down by 60% just over a night. My hunch is they are doing a last burst a sort of last stand and after thet they don't give a hoot of whats happening to the company or just let it glide along.

Adobe/Ft is in the same boat concentrating on lower end members. Started really well with the Adobe merger indjucing a sense of security and then just a few months later it was back to the old school.
« Last Edit: January 02, 2017, 06:27 by gyllens »


« Reply #26 on: January 02, 2017, 06:30 »
+1
6 years in SS. 0,38 club.

Portfolio +23,39%
Downloads -2,84%
Earnings -6,37%

Very good Jan-Jun ... down in a hole from July to December ...

« Reply #27 on: January 02, 2017, 08:45 »
0
Shutterstock:

Portfolio: +20%
Revenue: -2%
Downloads: -7%

For me Adobe / Fotolia increased with 40% in 2016. Someone else who experienced the same?

« Reply #28 on: January 02, 2017, 09:40 »
+6
angelawaye! 

SS going down the tube yes you could say that again. Pop over to the SS forum and you see the only ones who are happy are either new members or 0.25 members. I used to make payouts in half a day before December 2016 which went right down by 60% just over a night. My hunch is they are doing a last burst a sort of last stand and after thet they don't give a hoot of whats happening to the company or just let it glide along.

Adobe/Ft is in the same boat concentrating on lower end members. Started really well with the Adobe merger indjucing a sense of security and then just a few months later it was back to the old school.
Don't mistake your own situation with that of SS they are still growing though this is slowing but because other people are doing well and not you is not necessarily a problem for SS.

gyllens

« Reply #29 on: January 02, 2017, 10:59 »
+3
Ah yes^but I am still doing very well in comparison and considering. It don't stop me from seeing the mounting problems for this company. You have to be blind not to. SS like all public companies have invested and branched out into a heap of things not involving stock-sales. Think about that one and don't just stare yourself blind at stats and figures.
SS is unfortunately gaining such bad reputation at this moment not just here but in dozens of places open to the public. pretty soon like Istock they will be on the downhill slope to nowhere. Surprises me! Istock is the perfect example of how a great company can just completely and utterly fade away.

« Reply #30 on: January 02, 2017, 11:21 »
0
SS (video only):
portfolio: +18%
revenue: +31%
downloads +35%

It's been upwards last two years, but I'm kinda bugged out what 2017 will bring. I hope the trend goes upwards too.

« Reply #31 on: January 02, 2017, 11:45 »
0
Ah yes^but I am still doing very well in comparison and considering. It don't stop me from seeing the mounting problems for this company. You have to be blind not to. SS like all public companies have invested and branched out into a heap of things not involving stock-sales. Think about that one and don't just stare yourself blind at stats and figures.
SS is unfortunately gaining such bad reputation at this moment not just here but in dozens of places open to the public. pretty soon like Istock they will be on the downhill slope to nowhere. Surprises me! Istock is the perfect example of how a great company can just completely and utterly fade away.

As one of the blind could you possible enlighten me as to the trouble Shutterstock are in and what are the heap of investments they have made?

« Reply #32 on: January 02, 2017, 13:58 »
0
Ah yes^but I am still doing very well in comparison and considering. It don't stop me from seeing the mounting problems for this company. You have to be blind not to. SS like all public companies have invested and branched out into a heap of things not involving stock-sales. Think about that one and don't just stare yourself blind at stats and figures.
SS is unfortunately gaining such bad reputation at this moment not just here but in dozens of places open to the public. pretty soon like Istock they will be on the downhill slope to nowhere. Surprises me! Istock is the perfect example of how a great company can just completely and utterly fade away.

As one of the blind could you possible enlighten me as to the trouble Shutterstock are in and what are the heap of investments they have made?
I do agree that there is cause for concern and I most certainly wouldn't buy shares in them but I'm not sure its quite Armageddon yet. Most of their investments are I believe in related areas and unlike Getty/Istock they are sitting on a heap of cash so don't need to finance it through debt. And actually while Istock are a shambles they still rate as number 2. I think they might prove more resilient than you think.

dpimborough

« Reply #33 on: January 02, 2017, 15:15 »
+1
Ah yes^but I am still doing very well in comparison and considering. It don't stop me from seeing the mounting problems for this company. You have to be blind not to. SS like all public companies have invested and branched out into a heap of things not involving stock-sales. Think about that one and don't just stare yourself blind at stats and figures.
SS is unfortunately gaining such bad reputation at this moment not just here but in dozens of places open to the public. pretty soon like Istock they will be on the downhill slope to nowhere. Surprises me! Istock is the perfect example of how a great company can just completely and utterly fade away.


As one of the blind could you possible enlighten me as to the trouble Shutterstock are in and what are the heap of investments they have made?


Stop looking at it from an image producers point of view and go see what the real stock analysts are saying

http://www.fool.com/investing/2016/12/07/why-shutterstock-inc-fell-20-in-november.aspx?source=yahoo-2-news&utm_campaign=article&utm_medium=feed&utm_source=yahoo-2-news&yptr=yahoo

And an article from August 2016

https://www.newconstructs.com/danger-zone-shutterstock-sstk/

Basically behind all the baloney and hype SSTK is a problem waiting to happen
« Last Edit: January 02, 2017, 15:43 by Sammy the Cat »

« Reply #34 on: January 02, 2017, 15:46 »
0
Ah yes^but I am still doing very well in comparison and considering. It don't stop me from seeing the mounting problems for this company. You have to be blind not to. SS like all public companies have invested and branched out into a heap of things not involving stock-sales. Think about that one and don't just stare yourself blind at stats and figures.
SS is unfortunately gaining such bad reputation at this moment not just here but in dozens of places open to the public. pretty soon like Istock they will be on the downhill slope to nowhere. Surprises me! Istock is the perfect example of how a great company can just completely and utterly fade away.


As one of the blind could you possible enlighten me as to the trouble Shutterstock are in and what are the heap of investments they have made?


Stop looking at it from an image producers point of view and go see what the real stock analysts are saying

http://www.fool.com/investing/2016/12/07/why-shutterstock-inc-fell-20-in-november.aspx?source=yahoo-2-news&utm_campaign=article&utm_medium=feed&utm_source=yahoo-2-news&yptr=yahoo

And an article from August 2016

https://www.newconstructs.com/danger-zone-shutterstock-sstk/

Basically behind all the baloney and hype SSTK is a problem waiting to happen
Yes but most of us ARE image producers not investors so from our point of view what matters is are they selling our images from whats been posted I see a mix bag. If they stop selling them I will sell them somewhere else.

FlowerPower

« Reply #35 on: January 03, 2017, 09:50 »
+1
Ah yes^but I am still doing very well in comparison and considering. It don't stop me from seeing the mounting problems for this company. You have to be blind not to. SS like all public companies have invested and branched out into a heap of things not involving stock-sales. Think about that one and don't just stare yourself blind at stats and figures.
SS is unfortunately gaining such bad reputation at this moment not just here but in dozens of places open to the public. pretty soon like Istock they will be on the downhill slope to nowhere. Surprises me! Istock is the perfect example of how a great company can just completely and utterly fade away.

Called diversification. Companies that don't are the ones that die fast. Check GoPro or Fitbit why value has dropped sharply. SS is doing the right way. FT added reuters. You may not like what they do, but those two companies are growing not fading.

« Reply #36 on: January 03, 2017, 10:36 »
+1
I really doesn't prove anything one way or the other some companies diversify successfully some don't. From a stock buying perspective I doubt SS are growing fast enough to justify the share price.

« Reply #37 on: January 15, 2017, 15:08 »
0
Ah yes^but I am still doing very well in comparison and considering. It don't stop me from seeing the mounting problems for this company. You have to be blind not to. SS like all public companies have invested and branched out into a heap of things not involving stock-sales. Think about that one and don't just stare yourself blind at stats and figures.
SS is unfortunately gaining such bad reputation at this moment not just here but in dozens of places open to the public. pretty soon like Istock they will be on the downhill slope to nowhere. Surprises me! Istock is the perfect example of how a great company can just completely and utterly fade away.


As one of the blind could you possible enlighten me as to the trouble Shutterstock are in and what are the heap of investments they have made?


Stop looking at it from an image producers point of view and go see what the real stock analysts are saying

http://www.fool.com/investing/2016/12/07/why-shutterstock-inc-fell-20-in-november.aspx?source=yahoo-2-news&utm_campaign=article&utm_medium=feed&utm_source=yahoo-2-news&yptr=yahoo

And an article from August 2016

https://www.newconstructs.com/danger-zone-shutterstock-sstk/

Basically behind all the baloney and hype SSTK is a problem waiting to happen


An article explaining why Shutterstock, Inc. shares fell 20% has a stock photo from Getty Images at the top. There's your answer.

« Reply #38 on: January 16, 2017, 02:33 »
+1
if you are 9 years on shutterstock you were competing with 300 thousand  images then against 125 million now. big diff

« Reply #39 on: January 16, 2017, 11:08 »
0
Any holiday today ? Having a terrible day at Shutterstock.

Chichikov

« Reply #40 on: January 16, 2017, 11:52 »
0
Portfolio +25%
Earnings + 13%

« Reply #41 on: January 16, 2017, 12:36 »
0
Portfolio +25%
Earnings + 13%

in one day, one month, one year or since the beginning ? :)


« Reply #42 on: January 16, 2017, 15:28 »
0
Any holiday today ? Having a terrible day at Shutterstock.

Yes, Martin Luther King day in US - public holiday.

I'm not convinced it matters anyway, as sales have become dire there everyday. I'm currently about 70% down on the same public holiday from last year.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
2 Replies
4406 Views
Last post April 15, 2007, 08:57
by Kngkyle
Wishes for 2016

Started by Rinderart Shutterstock.com

16 Replies
5595 Views
Last post January 07, 2016, 11:39
by CJH
167 Replies
41986 Views
Last post January 22, 2016, 15:04
by Dumc
10 Replies
6309 Views
Last post January 22, 2016, 12:54
by Steveball
35 Replies
16387 Views
Last post August 20, 2016, 21:14
by pkphotos

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors