Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2012, 03:21

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print

Topic: SS Claims to be World's Largest Microstock  

(Read 1777 times)
GeoPappas


« on: January 09, 2007, 19:04 »

A news release went out today that begins with the following statement:

"Shutterstock®, already the world's largest subscription-based stock photo agency, today announced another milestone: Shutterstock has the largest photo collection in the microstock industry."

And then there is this line:

"The running total published on Shutterstock's homepage refers only to the photographs that have made the cut and are accepted into the collection, unlike other stock agencies that include rejected or deleted images into their "total" figures. "

See the following for the official SS thread:

http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15648


Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
Freezingpictures


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2007, 03:26 »

That is interesting, how do they know?
Probably they would not say so without having reliable information about that site wich starts wits F :-). I would like to know what they say to such a claim.


Ignore | Logged


litifeta



« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2007, 03:46 »

they are 40 short tonight. rejected everyone of my last batch.

hope they have more than one reviewer!


Ignore | Logged


Kiya



« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2007, 06:17 »

they are 40 short tonight. rejected everyone of my last batch.

hope they have more than one reviewer!

I've been getting all rejections too lately??


Ignore | Logged


yingyang0

iStock Gauge
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2007, 13:14 »

I've been getting the same rejection  level I've always had there. 22 out of my last 24 shots were excepted.


Ignore | Logged


fintastique



« Reply #5 on: January 10, 2007, 14:28 »

SS generally like my illustrations but are more picky with my photos always best to split similar photos into different batches and wait until the first has been reviewed before submitting.

Obviously SS don't believe FT 2 million image count either.


Ignore | Logged


a.k.a.-tom
« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2007, 23:57 »

...status quo... my rejection rate usually runs about   20% with SS. This weekend however,  I upoaded 65 pix, they rejected 9.  I was happy with that.  And for some unknown reason, my sales today and yesterday were higher than the last 2 weeks combined.  why, no clue.  but i'm not complaining.     


Ignore | Logged


mattb

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2007, 15:09 »

You guys missed the marketing speak... said they are the 'world's largest subscription-based stock photo agency'. All this has to mean is that they either have more images than the other subscription based sites or more subscribers.


Ignore | Logged


GeoPappas


« Reply #8 on: January 17, 2007, 15:12 »

You guys missed the marketing speak... said they are the 'world's largest subscription-based stock photo agency'. All this has to mean is that they either have more images than the other subscription based sites or more subscribers.

Sorry, but that is not what they said.  Re-read the release (or the first post in this thread).  It says:

"Shutterstock®, already the world's largest subscription-based stock photo agency, today announced another milestone: Shutterstock has the largest photo collection in the microstock industry."


Ignore | Logged


MiguelAngelo


« Reply #9 on: January 17, 2007, 18:50 »

They also get the award for the bigest colection of plastified noise free images   Grin Grin Grin

congratulations !!!


Ignore | Logged


mattb

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #10 on: January 18, 2007, 12:46 »

GeoPappas,

You are very correct. Embarrassed That's what I get for reading press releases when I didn't have any sleep the night before. 


Ignore | Logged


KiwiRob


« Reply #11 on: February 27, 2007, 15:04 »

I think there is another thread here saying Ft and IS are bigger.


Ignore | Logged


CJPhoto


« Reply #12 on: February 27, 2007, 17:14 »

Only Fotolia is bigger but their numbers just dont stack up.  They are either counter photos on multiple language sites more than once or they are count rejects (free section images).


Ignore | Logged


fintastique



« Reply #13 on: February 28, 2007, 04:31 »

FT state the "number of online images" when you upload an image they kept a tiny thumbnail online whether it is accepted, rejected, deleted or goes to the free section.

Doesn't say anywhere how many images that were accepted and for sale

SS overtook Istock a while back


Ignore | Logged


Envateo Photo ToolsMicrostock Insider
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Slowest reviewers / largest queues?
General Stock Discussion
melastmohican 6 1204 Last post April 16, 2008, 21:25
by mantonino
Vivozoom claims best affiliate program in the world
New Sites - General
Artemis 9 1794 Last post July 28, 2010, 19:33
by Artemis
World's largest sensor
Canon
leaf 3 1674 Last post September 01, 2010, 16:18
by qwerty
site displays images at 1300 x 870px (claims to sell them on paper, canvas...)
Image Sleuth
ann 18 1435 Last post September 07, 2011, 07:44
by ann
Small Claims for Copyright in the US?
Image Sleuth
RacePhoto 17 912 Last post February 22, 2012, 22:45
by RacePhoto

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc