Nav: Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 11, 2012, 15:02

Login with username, password and session length

MicrostockGroup

Microstockgroup Sponsors


« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 Print

Topic: MicrostockGroup Rank - What's yours  

(Read 13113 times)
Stu49


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #75 on: January 25, 2010, 10:39 »

There is now a "Rank" heading on the top of the site - where you can see how you compare to everyone else.  It will also show the change from week to week (starting next week)

I start searching from the bottom, and work my way up ! Wink




Ignore | Logged


DepositPhotos.com
Lee Torrens
« Reply #76 on: January 25, 2010, 23:39 »

Tyler, the rank pages are very cool.  Thankyou! 

One little bug - on the iStock page the usernames are linked to Dreamstime searches.


Ignore | Logged


leaf
« Reply #77 on: January 26, 2010, 01:45 »

Tyler, the rank pages are very cool.  Thankyou! 

One little bug - on the iStock page the usernames are linked to Dreamstime searches.

yeah - perhaps they should be linked to a profile page instead, but they search for the users images, which is what they were meant to do, although perhaps that is confusing?!


Ignore | Logged


leaf
« Reply #78 on: January 26, 2010, 01:46 »

There is now a "Rank" heading on the top of the site - where you can see how you compare to everyone else.  It will also show the change from week to week (starting next week)

I start searching from the bottom, and work my way up ! Wink




well I just learned I have a totally rotten overall DPI (downloads per image) That is obviously something I can improve!


Ignore | Logged


Randy McKown


Dreamstime Gauge
« Reply #79 on: January 26, 2010, 02:16 »

There is now a "Rank" heading on the top of the site - where you can see how you compare to everyone else.  It will also show the change from week to week (starting next week)

I start searching from the bottom, and work my way up ! Wink




well I just learned I have a totally rotten overall DPI (downloads per image) That is obviously something I can improve!

Ok here's what you need to do to solve the problem. Go to dreamstime and just head right into your management area and click the online files button. Now click on the title to sort files by downloads. The next thing you should do is select all the images with no sales .... now delete them all. LOL your DPI will skyrocket  Grin

I think that's a pretty solid plan. I tell ya what since you and me are tied for DPI at DT you go ahead and try it first and then let me know if it works out.


Ignore | Logged


leaf
« Reply #80 on: January 26, 2010, 02:33 »

There is now a "Rank" heading on the top of the site - where you can see how you compare to everyone else.  It will also show the change from week to week (starting next week)

I start searching from the bottom, and work my way up ! Wink




well I just learned I have a totally rotten overall DPI (downloads per image) That is obviously something I can improve!

Ok here's what you need to do to solve the problem. Go to dreamstime and just head right into your management area and click the online files button. Now click on the title to sort files by downloads. The next thing you should do is select all the images with no sales .... now delete them all. LOL your DPI will skyrocket  Grin

I think that's a pretty solid plan. I tell ya what since you and me are tied for DPI at DT you go ahead and try it first and then let me know if it works out.

well I am sure it would work Smiley  I wondered though, sometimes, if that wouldn't be such a dumb plan.  If I upload 50 landscape from a trip for example - landscapes generally don't sell that great, but sometimes they do.  If I have 50 to choose from then the buyers may make 200 purchases of my landscape but they will be spread over 50 images giving only 4 sales per image.  If I had only 5 landscape then I would get 40 sales per landscape and that would push the images into a higher level on DT.  I am exaggerating a bit, but I wonder if the idea of 'less is more' is the best strategy.

The one thing that keeps stopping me is always being surprised when an image starts to sell really well that I never thought would sell that great.


Ignore | Logged


Randy McKown


Dreamstime Gauge
« Reply #81 on: January 26, 2010, 03:24 »

well I am sure it would work Smiley  I wondered though, sometimes, if that wouldn't be such a dumb plan.  If I upload 50 landscape from a trip for example - landscapes generally don't sell that great, but sometimes they do.  If I have 50 to choose from then the buyers may make 200 purchases of my landscape but they will be spread over 50 images giving only 4 sales per image.  If I had only 5 landscape then I would get 40 sales per landscape and that would push the images into a higher level on DT.  I am exaggerating a bit, but I wonder if the idea of 'less is more' is the best strategy.

The one thing that keeps stopping me is always being surprised when an image starts to sell really well that I never thought would sell that great.

I think it would actually work but only for some people. Like on DT I know that even though my DPI is only 2.5 about 80% of my sales are all XL, Max & this week I'm seeing TIFF sales (btw, are those new or something because I've never seen them before) anyway my point is my sub sales are around 10-12% and small-med is maybe 5% and large 5% of the total sales. So if I removed all the 0 sales then chances are I would lose a lot of higher-credit sales so there's a greater risk involved ... I know I've heard others talking about getting crazy sub sales like over 60% .. if that was the case then I would definitely think removing a lot of the 0 sales would be a good idea because they now have a better fighting chance of eventually getting closer to making a dollar per download.

I don't know .. I'm not brave enough to take the risk on something like that. After all it only takes the right person to throw a shot with 0 sales in their public collection one day and then you suddenly get a couple 50 credit EL's from it out of nowhere ... that and going through and deleting files seems like a lot of work. I have to force myself to upload as it is LOL


Ignore | Logged


leaf
« Reply #82 on: January 26, 2010, 03:45 »

yeah, the TIFF sales are new.  They started with the recent price increase. 

I know what you mean though - I don't dare delete things either.  I don't mind the database cleaning DT is doing though.  It is a good and fair way to clean out the old files that are not selling.


Ignore | Logged


Stu49


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #83 on: January 26, 2010, 05:12 »

It would be good if USER could also be sorted alphabetically !?  If I want to see how well U are doing I have to search (from the top of course Wink

Also the Rank dropdown doesn't seem to size very well, when I increase font size !?  Smiley



Ignore | Logged


Vonkara



« Reply #84 on: January 26, 2010, 11:53 »

Why am I last again at Istock, it seem like my username stats do not stay more than 12 hours..
« Last Edit: January 26, 2010, 11:57 by Vonkara »

Ignore | Logged


leaf
« Reply #85 on: January 26, 2010, 13:16 »

Why am I last again at Istock, it seem like my username stats do not stay more than 12 hours..

because I was fiddling with the system again and broke things.  It is fixed now - your stats should be displayed correctly and should be updated correctly too.


Ignore | Logged


leaf
« Reply #86 on: January 26, 2010, 13:16 »

It would be good if USER could also be sorted alphabetically !?  If I want to see how well U are doing I have to search (from the top of course Wink

Also the Rank dropdown doesn't seem to size very well, when I increase font size !?  Smiley



can you send me a screen shot or something?  how is it looking bad?


Ignore | Logged


Vonkara



« Reply #87 on: January 26, 2010, 13:43 »

Why am I last again at Istock, it seem like my username stats do not stay more than 12 hours..

because I was fiddling with the system again and broke things.  It is fixed now - your stats should be displayed correctly and should be updated correctly too.

Yea thanks!


Ignore | Logged


Stu49


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #88 on: January 26, 2010, 14:28 »

It would be good if USER could also be sorted alphabetically !?  If I want to see how well U are doing I have to search (from the top of course Wink

Also the Rank dropdown doesn't seem to size very well, when I increase font size !?  Smiley



can you send me a screen shot or something?  how is it looking bad?

Don't have any way of doing selective screenshot at the mo, but if u Zoom in using FF the agency names enlarge but NOT the enclosing dropdown box.  Hope that helps Smiley



Ignore | Logged


Lee Torrens
« Reply #89 on: January 26, 2010, 21:50 »

Tyler, the rank pages are very cool.  Thankyou! 

One little bug - on the iStock page the usernames are linked to Dreamstime searches.

yeah - perhaps they should be linked to a profile page instead, but they search for the users images, which is what they were meant to do, although perhaps that is confusing?!

Sorry, I could have made that more clear.  It's not the search vs profile page I was pointing out.  It's that on the iStock rank page they link to searches at Dreamstime, not iStock like one would expect.  i.e. Why search for SJLocke images at Dreamstime.

 Smiley


Ignore | Logged


leaf
« Reply #90 on: January 27, 2010, 01:43 »

Tyler, the rank pages are very cool.  Thankyou!  

One little bug - on the iStock page the usernames are linked to Dreamstime searches.

yeah - perhaps they should be linked to a profile page instead, but they search for the users images, which is what they were meant to do, although perhaps that is confusing?!

Sorry, I could have made that more clear.  It's not the search vs profile page I was pointing out.  It's that on the iStock rank page they link to searches at Dreamstime, not iStock like one would expect.  i.e. Why search for SJLocke images at Dreamstime.

 Smiley

ahhh haaha.. yes, that is a problem.  will get right to it!

and now that I read it again you DID say iStock - i just missed it last time.

edit:  It is fixed now
« Last Edit: January 27, 2010, 05:24 by leaf »

Ignore | Logged


Stu49


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #91 on: January 28, 2010, 05:40 »

Just looked at the ranking for iStock and found one guy who has 637 images online but no downloads, according to the rankings, but if u click his name and go to IS it says he he has >6700 downloads !?

How can this be  Huh  Surely this makes a farce of the rankings !?


p.s. got my first sale at IS yesterday and still no guage under my avatar !?  Sad



Ignore | Logged


leaf
« Reply #92 on: January 28, 2010, 06:33 »

Just looked at the ranking for iStock and found one guy who has 637 images online but no downloads, according to the rankings, but if u click his name and go to IS it says he he has >6700 downloads !?

How can this be  Huh  Surely this makes a farce of the rankings !?


p.s. got my first sale at IS yesterday and still no guage under my avatar !?  Sad



Thanks for finding the error.  The ranking updater was getting stuck on someone who didn't have a username.  I have fixed it so it should be updating properly in the future.

The updates are only run once per day to keep the load light on iStock and Dreamstime, so you might not see immediate results if you get a sale.  i see you have a gauge now though.


Ignore | Logged


Stu49


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #93 on: January 28, 2010, 07:07 »

i see you have a gauge now though.

NO !! not here anyway !?  Only the DT one Sad



Ignore | Logged


leaf
« Reply #94 on: January 28, 2010, 07:21 »

i see you have a gauge now though.

NO !! not here anyway !?  Only the DT one Sad

ah yes, you are right.  It should be there in a few hours when the stats are updated again.  If not I will check it out again.


Ignore | Logged


Stu49


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #95 on: January 28, 2010, 08:25 »

i see you have a gauge now though.

NO !! not here anyway !?  Only the DT one Sad

ah yes, you are right.  It should be there in a few hours when the stats are updated again.  If not I will check it out again.


I look forward to that !  Grin

Just noticed there's nothing showing on your IS ranking for <10 d/ls !!  is that the start point !?

« Last Edit: January 28, 2010, 08:30 by Stu »

Ignore | Logged


Stu49


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #96 on: January 29, 2010, 07:52 »

i see you have a gauge now though.

NO !! not here anyway !?  Only the DT one Sad

ah yes, you are right.  It should be there in a few hours when the stats are updated again.  If not I will check it out again.


1 day later !!  and still nothing Sad



Ignore | Logged


cascoly

Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #97 on: January 31, 2010, 12:35 »

?? all the istock sales numbers are rounded [down?] to hundreds - eg i have 698 sales, but it displays as 600.  the portfolio numbers are exact

bug or feature?


Ignore | Logged


Stu49


Dreamstime GaugeiStock Gauge
« Reply #98 on: January 31, 2010, 13:58 »

i see you have a gauge now though.

NO !! not here anyway !?  Only the DT one Sad

ah yes, you are right.  It should be there in a few hours when the stats are updated again.  If not I will check it out again.


Several days later, 2 sales !  and still no guage !!  Sad


Ignore | Logged


leaf
« Reply #99 on: February 01, 2010, 06:52 »

your gauge is now live.  I found a couple more bugs.  thanks for the patience.


Ignore | Logged


Art portfolio websites - FoundmyselfMicrostock Insider
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
What's your rank?
Fotolia.com
Fortunefame 21 3411 Last post May 27, 2007, 22:31
by Whiz
How the big six rank for me
General - Big 4
tdoes 17 2884 Last post September 04, 2007, 19:18
by dbvirago
FT rank « 1 2 ... 12 13 »
Fotolia.com
madelaide 322 45178 Last post November 04, 2011, 10:17
by luissantos84
MicrostockGroup Blog - The best of MicrostockGroup
Site Related
leaf 0 742 Last post November 19, 2009, 03:37
by leaf
New rank option at FT
Fotolia.com
nicku 2 238 Last post February 09, 2012, 03:47
by nicku

TinyPortal v1.0.5 beta 1© Bloc