MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Copy - Paste IPTC software?  (Read 12086 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: November 12, 2011, 23:39 »
0

Is somebody using or know of any software that can copy-paste title, description and keywords from an image to another or even to multiple images ?

I mean without creating templates, just simply copy-paste everything ?

The only one I know of is cushystock , but i find it unstable sometimes and it tends to do copies of images and even renaming ones with capital letters.

It can be annoying especially when u deal with vectors and it renames your jpg file differently.


Thanks

 


« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2011, 23:48 »
0
Xnview can do this. It's a freeware I use a lot without any problems.

« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2011, 23:51 »
0
Xnview can do this. It's a freeware I use a lot without any problems.

Great thanks , I will try it tommorow

« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2011, 00:08 »
0
Xnview can do this. It's a freeware I use a lot without any problems.

Ok , can u please tell me how to do that ?

I click on file , go to copy image data , but there is no paste image data option.  If I click on another image and only go to paste nothing happens.

Thanks in advance...

« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2011, 00:18 »
0
Lightroom allows you to do this.  If you are only doing vectors, I'm sure there are cheaper ways to move the data, but its a great piece of software for photographers.

« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2011, 01:12 »
0
GraphicConverter will do this - I keyword small jpgs that can be easily emailed, them batch copy IPTC date to the TIFF file.

« Reply #6 on: November 13, 2011, 01:34 »
0
Is somebody using or know of any software that can copy-paste title, description and keywords from an image to another or even to multiple images ?
Irfanview in the Thumbs view.

« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2011, 10:45 »
0
I don't do that with Exifer. Once you have one image tagged, you can go to the other image and ask the data to be copied from the first file. I never tried doing that in Irfanview, but I use it when I want to add a keyword in the middle of the list, or reorder them. But then I go back to Exifer to put my website back in the EXIF file. I don't know if it's a problem in my version of IV, but it cleans this field.
« Last Edit: November 13, 2011, 20:23 by madelaide »

« Reply #8 on: November 13, 2011, 14:38 »
0
I don't that with Exifer.
The last time I checked (years ago), Exifer wasn't developed any more. I used it a couple of times and once it corrupted all my images. Perhaps there is a newer version?
Irfanview is developed constantly and it never corrupted my images. The workflow is quite fast in the Thumbs view (press 'T' when you open any image).

You can CTRL- or SHIFT-click image thumbs like in the Windows Explorer in a very intuitive way to make a (multi-) selection. Then menu : File | JPG Lossless Operations | Set IPTC data to selected files (CTRL-I)
A popup-window will open with then with the tabbed IPTC info. These contain the master data. You can fill in here all possible IPTC fields. In the last tab - and this is very important - you can determine how the master data are applied to the selection : all fields are copied into the selection, only filled-in fields are copied (empty fields are not touched), or only empty fields in the selection (slave data) are filled.

The pop-up window with master data is pre-filled with the IPTC data of the first image. This can be inconvenient when the master data are in an image somewhere in the middle of the selection. In that case a make a temporary copy of the master image called "a.jpg" so it is always in front. A second drawback is that IPTC data are only copied into the JPG, not into the TIF. This can be a handicap for people that shoot only raw without a corresponding JPG.

Lightroom can do this but I don't like Lightroom for editing since it can't clone nor selectively erase - and it's not free. To pay for the possibility to put IPTC in TIFs is somewhat overkill for me. Irfanview never let me down for many years, it's constantly developed, it's free and it works fastest for me. But others might have other equally fast solutions.

A typical application is right after the shoot when I fill in date/location/model code/copyright in all the images of the folder (shoot).
« Last Edit: November 13, 2011, 14:42 by AttilaTheNun »

« Reply #9 on: November 13, 2011, 17:26 »
0
Microsoft Pro Photo tools is actually a really good batch metadata editor... now if only it weren't base on the .net framework and I could use it in Linux.... :(

« Reply #10 on: November 13, 2011, 18:34 »
0
Exiftool can do all kinds of IPTC manipulation.

« Reply #11 on: November 13, 2011, 20:22 »
0
I don't that with Exifer.
The last time I checked (years ago), Exifer wasn't developed any more. I used it a couple of times and once it corrupted all my images. Perhaps there is a newer version?

I don't drink, but for some reason I wrote "I don't" where I should have said "I do". :)  I will correct my original post

Yes, Exifer is not updated anymore, but I never had a problem with it. I'll try the step-by-step procedure you explained here, but Exifer's seems simpler (just click to copy data from file, then choose file). I never tried adding data to a TIF file, as I only add info to the final JPEG.

Also, it is important to notice that the "copy data from file" option from Exifer also overrides any EXIF info such as the photo settings. As I don't save that in my final files either, this is not an issue for me.

« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2011, 05:16 »
0
Another option is to use Phil Harvey's ExifTool.
http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/
It's kept up to date and reads / writes nearly everything in the Exif data.
It's command line only so you'll probably also want ExifTool GUI
http://u88.n24.queensu.ca/exiftool/forum/index.php/topic,2750.0.html?PHPSESSID=bb842b586445cc545538457517791a31
which gives a GUI for most stuff you'll need to do. The version from the address I've given is the up to date version 4.23.
 

« Reply #13 on: November 14, 2011, 11:46 »
0
Microsoft Pro Photo tools is actually a really good batch metadata editor... now if only it weren't base on the .net framework and I could use it in Linux.... :(

Maybe it does some things well, but I think it's the worst keyword editor I've ever seen.  It puts all the keywords in one horizontal line, so you have to keep scrolling side-to-side and can never see all of them at once.  And you have to add semicolons yourself.

Another Microsoft loser - couldn't uninstall it fast enough.
« Last Edit: November 14, 2011, 11:50 by stockastic »

« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2011, 14:34 »
0
Microsoft Pro Photo tools is actually a really good batch metadata editor... now if only it weren't base on the .net framework and I could use it in Linux.... :(

Maybe it does some things well, but I think it's the worst keyword editor I've ever seen.  It puts all the keywords in one horizontal line, so you have to keep scrolling side-to-side and can never see all of them at once.  And you have to add semicolons yourself.

Another Microsoft loser - couldn't uninstall it fast enough.

Yeah I know what you mean. An older earlier version actually didn't have that problem... I've been hunting for a good Linux solution. The best I've found is geeqie, but no batch editing it seems.

« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2011, 18:04 »
0
Microsoft Pro Photo tools is actually a really good batch metadata editor... now if only it weren't base on the .net framework and I could use it in Linux.... :(

Maybe it does some things well, but I think it's the worst keyword editor I've ever seen.  It puts all the keywords in one horizontal line, so you have to keep scrolling side-to-side and can never see all of them at once.  And you have to add semicolons yourself.

Another Microsoft loser - couldn't uninstall it fast enough.

Yeah I know what you mean. An older earlier version actually didn't have that problem... I've been hunting for a good Linux solution. The best I've found is geeqie, but no batch editing it seems.

As a (former) software engineer, I try not to ridicule other people's work, but putting a large collection of individual words all in a one-line, horizontallly scrolling edit field is just hilariously bad.   

I don't think I've ever found a really good tool for the simple task of keywording.   Every time I go through this, I think about writing one myself; but parsing the EXIF data would be a lot of work and I couldn't find any open source code for that purpose.

« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2011, 19:51 »
0
Microsoft Pro Photo tools is actually a really good batch metadata editor... now if only it weren't base on the .net framework and I could use it in Linux.... :(

i like this, but something strange happened on the last update of the software - the title i put in gets extracted by some agencies - eg, Big & SS, 123, but not by others - DT, yay,

no agency has ever replied when i reported this - very strange

also if you enter a title, then enter a desc, then save, the title replaces the desc.  i ended up entering title, saving, then entering desc and saving.

i've uninstalled & re-installed latest version but still happens

« Reply #17 on: November 14, 2011, 22:55 »
0
As much as I like batch editing tools, to be honest, they tend to produce a lot of small errors and encourage  more haphazard keywording result. Speed can have its downsides.

RacePhoto

« Reply #18 on: November 17, 2011, 17:43 »
0
Is somebody using or know of any software that can copy-paste title, description and keywords from an image to another or even to multiple images ?
Irfanview in the Thumbs view.

Worth Quoting - IrfanView Free use the Thumbs section, lossless editing.

Another one that works with everything, Breeze Browser Pro, XMP and old IPTC and does batch editing.

microstockphoto.co.uk

« Reply #19 on: November 18, 2011, 13:20 »
0

i like this, but something strange happened on the last update of the software - the title i put in gets extracted by some agencies - eg, Big & SS, 123, but not by others - DT, yay,

no agency has ever replied when i reported this - very strange


I noticed that some agencies import different fields as title.
I always write the same title to 3 fields: Title, Headline writer and Object name (as called in XnView and ExifTool; names may vary slightly)

« Reply #20 on: November 18, 2011, 22:13 »
0
I noticed that some agencies import different fields as title.
Yes, what a mess. Veer is terrible at it, all others in the microstock world are quite OK.
I always write the same title to 3 fields: Title, Headline writer and Object name (as called in XnView and ExifTool; names may vary slightly)
The confusion stems from the fact that that the object name really wasn't intended for holding the title in the pre-micro world (like News photos) but the Caption writer or rather headline was. Object name should hold the file name.

Here is a page where the IPTC scheme is explained with a list of both Mac- and Windows programs that treat IPTC. The list is not up to date though.

« Reply #21 on: November 19, 2011, 10:21 »
0
IS is the only agency that wasn't able to read IPTC data entered with Exifer. When I emailed support years ago, they said they were aware and looking into it, however - surprise!! - they never fixed it.

« Reply #22 on: November 20, 2011, 01:39 »
0

i like this, but something strange happened on the last update of the software - the title i put in gets extracted by some agencies - eg, Big & SS, 123, but not by others - DT, yay,

no agency has ever replied when i reported this - very strange


I noticed that some agencies import different fields as title.
I always write the same title to 3 fields: Title, Headline writer and Object name (as called in XnView and ExifTool; names may vary slightly)

tx - i use guiexiftool now & writing to object name seems to have cleared all problems for me - i had tried headline in the MS prp photo tools but headline didnt work, nor title

microstockphoto.co.uk

« Reply #23 on: November 20, 2011, 02:43 »
0
I noticed that some agencies import different fields as title.
I always write the same title to 3 fields: Title, Headline writer and Object name (as called in XnView and ExifTool; names may vary slightly)
tx - i use guiexiftool now & writing to object name seems to have cleared all problems for me - i had tried headline in the MS prp photo tools but headline didnt work, nor title

glad it worked

« Reply #24 on: November 20, 2011, 05:49 »
0
For what it is worth, i use Nikon View (browser) to copy title, description and keywords between images.
No problem between jpg and tiff and vice versa.
I don't use it for keywording, just copy and pasting.

Patrick


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
4 Replies
3492 Views
Last post May 16, 2007, 05:55
by CJPhoto
9 Replies
9841 Views
Last post February 18, 2011, 07:06
by getbizy
16 Replies
8699 Views
Last post March 31, 2016, 06:41
by Melissa22
4 Replies
4098 Views
Last post February 17, 2016, 05:30
by PatrickA1
22 Replies
7252 Views
Last post October 22, 2020, 21:33
by cascoly

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors