MicrostockGroup
Agency Based Discussion => Sites that no longer exist => StockXpert.com => Topic started by: Randomway on April 01, 2009, 17:26
-
I was wondering what others thought of an idea being proposed at Stockxpert.
http://www.stockxpert.com/forum/show_messages/23961 (http://www.stockxpert.com/forum/show_messages/23961)
I'd like to see the size of sub images reduced, but I'm not sure about the change to opt-in. I know some folks here are currently opted out of the subscriptions plan. Do you think it would be a good trade off?
-
I added to the discussion there. I always thought about a number of credits available / day instead of a number of images... Thanks for having linked this thread Randomway!
-
I don't like that. I hate subs.
Vonkara, I hadn't read your post there, and I made a similar suggestion. IS subs is the only type I consider edible.
-
I vote for the file size restriction.
I think by restricting the file sizes, many contributors may opt in voluntarily.
-
Freedom,
They meant to make trade: limiting sizes but forcing opt-in.
Regards,
Adelaide
-
Adelaide, I know, I was only agreeing to Part 1. I also agree with you that they should consider the IS model since they are all under Getty now.
-
I also think it's fair for us contributors. that is restricting the size.
-
I really hope that they change it. I am opted in anyway so it can only be good for me. I hate selling large sizes so cheaply so this will make it much more acceptable.
-
I am opted in anyway so it can only be good for me.
The same here.