Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2012, 02:51

MicrostockGroup

MicrostockGroup » Forum » New Sites / Low Earners » Sites that no longer exist » StockXpert.com » Stockxpert's 'Opinion needed on subscriptions' thread

Microstockgroup Sponsors

« previous next »

Pages: [1]

Topic: Stockxpert's 'Opinion needed on subscriptions' thread

(Read 888 times)

Randomway

« on: April 01, 2009, 17:26 »

#link

I was wondering what others thought of an idea being proposed at Stockxpert.

http://www.stockxpert.com/forum/show_messages/23961

I'd like to see the size of sub images reduced, but I'm not sure about the change to opt-in. I know some folks here are currently opted out of the subscriptions plan. Do you think it would be a good trade off?


	Ignore \| Logged

Vonkara

« Reply #1 on: April 01, 2009, 17:42 »

#link

I added to the discussion there. I always thought about a number of credits available / day instead of a number of images... Thanks for having linked this thread Randomway!


	Ignore \| Logged

madelaide

Premium Member

« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2009, 17:57 »

#link

I don't like that. I hate subs.

Vonkara, I hadn't read your post there, and I made a similar suggestion. IS subs is the only type I consider edible.


	Ignore \| Logged

Freedom

« Reply #3 on: April 01, 2009, 18:02 »

#link

I vote for the file size restriction.

I think by restricting the file sizes, many contributors may opt in voluntarily.


	Ignore \| Logged

madelaide

Premium Member

« Reply #4 on: April 01, 2009, 18:05 »

#link

Freedom,

They meant to make trade: limiting sizes but forcing opt-in.

Regards,
Adelaide


	Ignore \| Logged

Freedom

« Reply #5 on: April 01, 2009, 18:24 »

#link

Adelaide, I know, I was only agreeing to Part 1. I also agree with you that they should consider the IS model since they are all under Getty now.


« Last Edit: April 01, 2009, 22:32 by Freedom »	Ignore \| Logged

gbcimages

« Reply #6 on: April 01, 2009, 18:49 »

#link

I also think it's fair for us contributors. that is restricting the size.


	Logged

fotografer

Premium Member

« Reply #7 on: April 03, 2009, 02:49 »

#link

I really hope that they change it. I am opted in anyway so it can only be good for me. I hate selling large sizes so cheaply so this will make it much more acceptable.


	Ignore \| Logged

Xalanx

« Reply #8 on: April 03, 2009, 04:00 »

#link

Quote from: fotografer on April 03, 2009, 02:49

I am opted in anyway so it can only be good for me.

The same here.


	Ignore \| Logged

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

Jump to:

Related Topics
	Subject	Started by	Replies	Views	Last post
	StockXpert: Thanks for Listening (re Subscriptions) StockXpert.com	StockManiac	1	972	October 10, 2007, 16:26 by StockManiac
	Subscriptions via Reseller API? Fotolia.com	jsnover	3	1359	May 30, 2008, 02:57 by leaf
	Subscriptions... Is there a way to opt out? Dreamstime.com	Nemo1024	11	1915	July 16, 2008, 12:31 by Jack Schiffer
	Subscriptions effect General Stock Discussion	Magnum	6	1225	July 01, 2008, 13:43 by rjmiz
	subscriptions General Stock Discussion	tierlakay	15	2721	January 03, 2009, 08:25 by Fred

Microstockgroup Sponsors

MicrostockGroup Email Updates

Microstock Poll Results

Site	Earnings Rating
Top Tier - Big 4
Shutterstock	100
iStock	66.7
Fotolia	34.9
Dreamstime	26.7

Middle Tier
DepositPhotos	21.6
123RF	16.3
Canstockphoto	11.2
Bigstockphoto	9.5
Veer	8.7

Low Earners
PantherMedia	6.7
PhotoDune	5.8
isignstock	4.1
Zoonar	3.5
GLStockImages	2.7
Stockfresh	2.2
YayMicro	1.8
FeaturePics	1.4
MostPhotos	1.3
ScanStockPhoto	1.1
Crestock	0.8
Cutcaster	0.6
AllYouCanStock	0.1
ClipartOf
Pond5
RevoStock
Clipcanvas
DrawShop
ClipDealer
PhotoSpin
VectorStock
GraphicRiver
Pixmac
PhotoCase
The3dStudio
photaki
SuperHug
PhotoKore
iRockStock
Vivozoom
StockPhotoMedia
Regimages
ImageVortex
Imagegate
ViscoImages

More Poll Results Updated: 2012-05-27

Advertise on Microstockgroup.com | Contact: [email protected]