MicrostockGroup

I had a similar experience at Dreamtime (accepted everywhere else).

I think that is one of the more annoying rejections as if they say it is technically wrong, i can improve but for the small sites to say they have enough just annoys me.

I'm quite satisfied personally. And when I get rejections, it's usually reflected somehow at iStock and Shutterstock.

Just had the word from SS OK they accepted 90/123

and 90 new images at SS is going to generate a lot more money than at StockXpert, curious what the other sites think of the latest batches. Glad to see FT and BS have speeded up, alas for CanStockPhoto

Latest batch 9/49 (though they accepted one I had forgotten to rotate - its hard to tell quite abstract)

Funny you should mention this as I just had a rejection today for too many similar images. I did a few searches and they in fact had only one which I thought was particularly odd. I'm assuming though in my case and in yours they are thinking in much much broader terms. Too many buildings in general rather than too many of that building.

I took part in a forum discussion about "cloud" images at DT, because they also fall in the "we have too many of these" reason.  There are many "cloud" images that are just clouds, but if someone looks for a specific type cloud may not find many options of just clouds . I tried that with my cirrus and cirrostratus images, most of what you get are images with clouds, not of clouds, and some are not even cirrus or cirrostratus. 

I emailed them about this.  Although they are generally fast and helpful when I question a rejection, I never got a reply nor a reverse in the rejection.  Maybe because I brought this to the forum, though I wasn't the one starting the thread.

Regards,
Adelaide