MicrostockGroup

Can you provide links to the 10 that you submitted? It might help us give you a bit of direction.

kaarsten: Yes my port is small.. but hoping it will grow. Already put a lot of thought in the exclusive issue and it's because it's a small port (for now) that it has to be spread over a wider area to get noticed. Otherwise i would have lost out on half the sales this month. The $5 made after 2 weeks of being with graphicleftovers wouldn't have happened if i had stayed with say, DT or SS.

What do you mean "never reach the payout limit?"  Never say never. Im starting small but thinking big   

elvinstar: It was pretty much a selection of what you see on my page; http://www.dreamstime.com/Devonsun_info

.. the mp3s, balloon silhouette, camera lens, search light city, girl in dress silhouette, USA healthcare etc

Thanks for the input, cclapper.

At least i'm not the only one. I'll do as you say and browse more to try to figure out what it is they are looking for. Looks like i will have to change my approach to get in with Veer.

I've tried twice and failed !  My images are mainly isolated object shots, and they obviously don't want them !! 

I won't try again, unless I undergo a change in style ! 

I've been accepted at Veer a month ago. I uploaded vectors (and didn't upload .jpg preview, just the vector file with RGB color profile), and all the previews has weird colors. I wrote to support and they told me to upload my own preview to solve this problem. Now I don't know if it is worth the effort because I just looked at my port there, and 0 views/0 sales in 1 month. I wasn't expecting much sales, but 0 views? Also my images still don't show up in search...

It's only 9 vectors (one of the first 10 was rejected). I didn't upload more because of this preview issue and because of the lack of views... I would post my port here, but I have no idea how to do that.

Yes, you are right.. The views doesn't count (especially with such a small port), but if my images doesn't show up in search I don't see how I could get sales over there (even with more images).

Thanks. I went to Workspace and filled in some information about me (that was missing) and the tax-form. But now I don't see any activate button, or anything. On the "Approved(9)" tab it says: 'These files have run the approval gauntlet and are (or will soon be) available for customers to purchase online through Veer Marketplace. ' But that was there before sending the tax-form...

My tip is never to get aboard this sinking ship. I'm sorry I wasted my time uploading.

Sorry if I'm sounding harsh, but my advice is to concentrate your efforts in producing better images instead of thinking about joining a lot of agencies.
Your images just don't "cut it" for me, and the same propably applies to Veer reviewers (and buyers)

Wandering off the Veer issue, but you may need to reconsider your keywording also.
I looked at your image 'Devon Gull' on iStock.
You have listed several incompatible locations (the correct one only should be listed); other words which are irrelevant to the photo like fish, salt water fish, tourism, coastline, and several keywords of the type iStock doesn't like, for example feather and beak (99.% of birds have feathers and beaks: you should only use these keywords if the feather or beak are specific features of the mate.)
As the others say, work on growing your ports on your existing agencies. And remember that keywords are really important. Think of it this way, if someone did a search on 'fish' or even 'feather', how likely is your image to meet that wish?

I had the same problem with Veers but my last upload to them was 3000x2400 @ 300dpi,figure this was a good size but I was wrong,they where rejected for pixelation. Was this a good size or not?