MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Pixel quality issue  (Read 3502 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: January 07, 2010, 16:33 »
0
What do they mean by that? I googled and I could not figure out what's definition of this term.


« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2010, 16:57 »
0
i never really pay too much attention to try to figure out the semantics of this rejection, given that i usually get one image rejected and the other say 20 from the same shoot approved. i really don't bother to try to second guess the reviewer, as it's not worth my time to re-process it to placate his holiness. so, i never ever resubmit to them ever. 

EXCEPTION would be IS when a certain compassionate  reviewer actually took the trouble to explain in plain unambiguous English to explain to me why it was rejected.  the exemplary reviewer actually give me a SPECIFIC UNDERSTANDABLE EXPLANATION, of which when I a mere human like the reviewer (phew, thank goodness that at IS such a reviewer actually exists)  corrected the SPECIFIED  REASON OF REJECTION  most times gets approved quite promptly on resubmit.

but for DT, i gather the esteemed reviewer meant (quote)...

Distorted pixels due to poor sensor performance, image was interpolated, poorly scanned, upsampled, oversharpened or JPG was not saved at the highest quality.

iow, one or all of the above.  :D :D :D :D

i gather it is the same for FT except a little more ambiguous, that only expert in hieroglyphic of DT and or FT can understand.  ;)
« Last Edit: January 07, 2010, 17:15 by PERSEUS »

« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2010, 19:00 »
0
Distorted pixels due to poor sensor performance
Pixels are never distorted. They can't, they are perfect squares. If they would be distorted, they wouldn't fit in an image or there would be cracks in between them. An image can be distorted, a pixel can't.  ::) ;D

« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2010, 19:07 »
0
Distorted pixels due to poor sensor performance
Pixels are never distorted. They can't, they are perfect squares. If they would be distorted, they wouldn't fit in an image or there would be cracks in between them. An image can be distorted, a pixel can't.  ::) ;D

tell that to Prince Achilles  ;)
not my words FD. that was a copy paste from the rejection reason box of DT.

« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2010, 20:45 »
0
Some of my pictures were refused because of that pixel issue, others because of "not suitable for marketplace". The funniest this time is "too similar to other accepted image". I checked twice but all other images that even came close to this one were rejected because of "not suitable etc". I don't bother, they are a very slow earner for me and all rejected files do very well on the big six sites.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
1 Replies
3793 Views
Last post November 22, 2008, 17:22
by stormchaser
16 Replies
10613 Views
Last post August 29, 2011, 04:23
by Gannet77
2 Replies
2855 Views
Last post November 14, 2014, 15:59
by stefanocarocci
2 Replies
3232 Views
Last post June 26, 2017, 06:36
by SpaceStockFootage
1 Replies
1943 Views
Last post December 07, 2017, 06:50
by philopenshaw

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors