pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: 123 is the next one which kicks the bucket?  (Read 18545 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #25 on: January 06, 2014, 12:21 »
0
Whats the alternative to algolrithms?


« Reply #26 on: January 06, 2014, 12:22 »
0
Whats the alternative to algolrithms?

Jetpack monkeys.  Well, monkeys with jetpacks, obviously.

stock-will-eat-itself

« Reply #27 on: January 06, 2014, 14:51 »
0
Whats the alternative to algolrithms?

Editing, curation, tiered pricing decided by humans with an eye for aesthetics.

Or alternatively accept everything, sell it all at rock bottom prices and let HAL sort it out.

« Reply #28 on: January 06, 2014, 15:12 »
0
Whats the alternative to algolrithms?

Editing, curation, tiered pricing decided by humans with an eye for aesthetics.


You can't run a microstock agency like that.

stock-will-eat-itself

« Reply #29 on: January 06, 2014, 16:40 »
0
Whats the alternative to algolrithms?

Editing, curation, tiered pricing decided by humans with an eye for aesthetics.


You can't run a microstock agency like that.

Not anymore.

I'm going back in my monkey cage to fling sh!t at passing tourists.
« Last Edit: January 06, 2014, 16:43 by stock-will-eat-itself »

« Reply #30 on: January 06, 2014, 17:20 »
0
We're told inspection is done by humans and look at the fuss that causes :)

« Reply #31 on: January 07, 2014, 16:38 »
0
Whats the alternative to algolrithms?

Editing, curation, tiered pricing decided by humans with an eye for aesthetics.


You can't run a microstock agency like that.

Not anymore.

I'm going back in my monkey cage to fling sh!t at passing tourists.

You never could. Istock have demonstrated that with their ridiculous efforts at "curating" and "aesthetics" (which was completely destroyed by the decision to put any old Getty rubbish into Vetta and to drive every inde file, however aesthetically brilliant, into the bargain basement).


 

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results