Author Topic: Basic Editing knowledege is a Must! (Read 4913 times)

lagereek · « **on:** March 22, 2011, 01:36 »

So I have given them my typical oi-industrial shots for years, accepted, so I put a Universal oil-sign in front of the industry and then, along comes this Reviewer and wants a property-release? $:-\$

What for?? signs in industry are Univeral, unless it stipulates a name. The words Oil, fuel, gas, are names of petrochemical products, NOT the names of places.

Why this time wasting and why this lack of basic knowledege.

It seams to me that many sites nowdays just simply thow in people as reviewers, without any formal training and simply hope for ........... the best.

Anymore of this nonsense and I wont supply any industrials, simple as that.

lagereek · « **Reply #2 on:** March 22, 2011, 02:47 »

Quote from: Anglee on March 22, 2011, 02:08

Hi Lagereek,

Kindly email the image with Universal oil-sign to [email protected] and we'll look into this matter.

Cheers,
Anglee

Hi Anglee!

Yes I will mail them, although they are among the latest batch and rejects.

cheers.

BaldricksTrousers · « **Reply #3 on:** March 22, 2011, 02:53 »

I notice there were a bunch of somewhat odd "release required" rejects in my last batch, too. I suppose it's either a new reviewer or that instructions have gone out to get even more cautious than ever.

Pixart · « **Reply #4 on:** March 22, 2011, 10:35 »

Last week they asked for a release on an empty hockey rink and I don't think you can get any more generic than white boards, a net and the regulation paint on the crease and lines

lagereek · « **Reply #5 on:** March 22, 2011, 12:04 »

Quote from: Pixart on March 22, 2011, 10:35

Last week they asked for a release on an empty hockey rink and I don't think you can get any more generic than white boards, a net and the regulation paint on the crease and lines

Well, you know, after half a dozen lagers I would also go blind!

lagereek · « **Reply #7 on:** April 06, 2011, 01:27 »

Anglee! Yesterday, the 4th of April, I keyworded a couple of shots that are selling for thousands of dollars at almost all other sites, "engineers working inside oil and gas installation"
This particular reviewer did exactly what I expected him: rejecting for poor lighting?? he mistook a light-blue toning for a WB error, etc. I mean, same toning concepts are to be found in my Getty-RM port, IS, etc, etc, generating well over a 4-figured amount.

now I havent got the time to upload again and so on but frankly its an impossibillity to conduct and do business like this. Check out my port at IS, username "lagereek" and see for yourself. username at 123, is "fred12"

Its got to be more professional then this.

best Christian Lagereek