pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Site problems at 123?  (Read 16484 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

donding

  • Think before you speak
« Reply #25 on: February 22, 2010, 14:49 »
0
I've been having the same problems with login also. They finally reviewed my images today. Rejected 45 out of 72...they want property release for two old barn photos...this old barns are falling down...but they didn't request one for the decent barn in the field....go figure

They actually accepted a shot of a 1948 International Farmall Tractor without a property release. All the rest of them were refused for poor lighting and composition....even the night shots of lite up boat piers for poor lighting. I think the reviewer needs a lesson in reviewing.

Does anyone know if you get a payout if you close your account even though it's below minimum payout?? The ones they accepted won't sell to well on there and the ones they rejected are successful at the other sites....so what to do...what to do....


« Reply #26 on: February 22, 2010, 16:00 »
0
As I said in another thread, even though I had reached a payout, my account balance went to minus after I deleted some photos and they have not paid me, nor replied to my emails.

I would never had thought that 123 would do that!

donding

  • Think before you speak
« Reply #27 on: February 22, 2010, 16:08 »
0
Something is going on....maybe they are getting bought out like so many others recently. Personally I don't know why someone would want to buy them out because they aren't that good of a site to begin with. Look at StockXpert....they started acting funny before Getty latched onto them, but they were a performing site, not like 123RF

« Reply #28 on: February 22, 2010, 17:36 »
0
I don't have any problem other selling too little, but today I got a sale on S size that paid me 1.50, when it's normally 0.60.  Any clues?

« Reply #29 on: February 22, 2010, 17:39 »
0
I don't have any problem other selling too little, but today I got a sale on S size that paid me 1.50, when it's normally 0.60.  Any clues?
ah, so that is where my money is going  ;)

« Reply #30 on: February 22, 2010, 21:19 »
0
I don't have any problem other selling too little, but today I got a sale on S size that paid me 1.50, when it's normally 0.60.  Any clues?

Hello there,

We did a check on your download. That particular download that you're referring to is a P - Print size (Med). Hence, it's correct at $1.50 per download. :)

LSD72

  • My Bologna has a first name...
« Reply #31 on: February 22, 2010, 22:14 »
0
Ummmmm...any answers to the other observations?  ???

« Reply #32 on: February 23, 2010, 05:37 »
0
I don't have any problem other selling too little, but today I got a sale on S size that paid me 1.50, when it's normally 0.60.  Any clues?

Hello there,

We did a check on your download. That particular download that you're referring to is a P - Print size (Med). Hence, it's correct at $1.50 per download. :)
Thanks for the explanation.  Good to see that extra money.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
2 Replies
2820 Views
Last post December 13, 2006, 18:01
by roman
1 Replies
3494 Views
Last post February 20, 2007, 23:28
by epixx
36 Replies
29626 Views
Last post June 15, 2009, 19:19
by click_click
22 Replies
8130 Views
Last post August 18, 2009, 22:43
by SNP
Problems with DT's site today?

Started by Justanotherphotographer Dreamstime.com

2 Replies
3060 Views
Last post January 23, 2016, 05:10
by Justanotherphotographer

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors