MicrostockGroup

Microstock Photography Forum - General => AI Generated Stock Photography => Topic started by: wds on January 21, 2024, 10:57

Title: AI Submissions on Adobestock...."photo" vs. "illustration"
Post by: wds on January 21, 2024, 10:57
When submitting AI assets to Adobestock, do folks classify as "Photos" or "Illustration"?

I would think if the image is truly "photorealistic" than it would be classed as "photo", otherwise "illustration"?
There is definitely a large "grey area". What have folks been doing in this regard?
Title: Re: AI Submissions on Adobestock...."photo" vs. "illustration"
Post by: Andrej.S. on January 21, 2024, 11:34
When submitting AI assets to Adobestock, do folks classify as "Photos" or "Illustration"?

I would think if the image is truly "photorealistic" than it would be classed as "photo", otherwise "illustration"?
There is definitely a large "grey area". What have folks been doing in this regard?

Yes, there is currently definitely a gray area.
There is an official guideline from Adobe with examples of images, but it is not clear when exactly the category for photos no longer applies.
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.html

I would also assume that the AI Images have to be really photorealistic to be classified as photos.

For illustrations I would say e.g. for surreal illustrations, collages, obviously 3D content, etc.
Title: Re: AI Submissions on Adobestock...."photo" vs. "illustration"
Post by: korner83 on January 22, 2024, 09:35
It depends on the image, if it is photorealistic you need to set it to photo. If it is non photo-real eg. illustrative, artistic, then it needs to be illustration.

When submitting AI assets to Adobestock, do folks classify as "Photos" or "Illustration"?

I would think if the image is truly "photorealistic" than it would be classed as "photo", otherwise "illustration"?
There is definitely a large "grey area". What have folks been doing in this regard?