MicrostockGroup
Agency Based Discussion => Bigstock.com => Topic started by: chapabatida on July 02, 2015, 16:45
-
Hi everybody
Long time daily reader of MSG this is my first post and yes I agree :-[ it is another rant concerning unfair practices from some if not most of stock sites.
Somewhere around 2004 I started contibuting with IS SS DT BS FT 123RF CRS and CS and as time went by I ended (lack of results or prepotency) with most of them leaving myself with SS DT and BS.
Never had good results with DT and their "too similar" policy/long reviews/worthless results made me stop uploading and probably will close account too.
Today while checking selling results with BS had another slap on my ever shrinking will to keep on.
Two images were sold http://www.bigstockphoto.com/image-54324548/ (http://www.bigstockphoto.com/image-54324548/) and http://www.bigstockphoto.com/image-68893429/ (http://www.bigstockphoto.com/image-68893429/) made null
(Adjustment/Invalid Transaction) and immediately "replaced" by http://www.bigstockphoto.com/image-54094204/ (http://www.bigstockphoto.com/image-54094204/) and
http://www.bigstockphoto.com/image-72662620/ (http://www.bigstockphoto.com/image-72662620/)
Am I right to think that with a procedure of this kind anyone can get 4 pictures and pay for 2 only? First you download 2 and
say "its not exactly what I want" and while keeping them you download another 2 with the benevolence of those who should be
the first guardians of our/theirs inheritance?
We really are "sitting ducks" till the day (if ever) we join into a common voice and stand up for our dignity.
End of rant.
My regards to all of you.