MicrostockGroup

Agency Based Discussion => Bigstock.com => Topic started by: louoates on May 09, 2012, 16:38

Title: Finalist: Laziest Rejection Ever from BS "Approvers"
Post by: louoates on May 09, 2012, 16:38

Here is the first of three rejections I just got today from BS:

Lou OATES,

Sorry, but an image you submitted was not approved at Bigstock :

Photo Name:   Balloons_3d
Photo ID:     1414205
Your User ID:
Approvers Comments:

Quality Control: FOCUS ISSUE
Quality Control: EXPOSURE ISSUE


Thank you,

Bigstock Approvers

The three that were rejected today were submitted OVER TWO YEARS AGO.
And, yes, indeed, all three were accepted back then at the other sites.

And when did the "inspectors" become "approvers"?

Title: Re: Finalist: Laziest Rejection Ever from BS "Approvers"
Post by: ShadySue on May 09, 2012, 18:35

Do you mean you submitted the image two years ago and that's you just getting feedback on the submission?

Title: Re: Finalist: Laziest Rejection Ever from BS "Approvers"
Post by: louoates on May 09, 2012, 19:52

Yes, I uploaded them somewhat over two years ago and this was the first time I heard about what happened to them.  Maybe the cleaning crew found them under a desk. 

Title: Re: Finalist: Laziest Rejection Ever from BS "Approvers"
Post by: grp_photo on May 10, 2012, 01:04

Quote from: louoates on May 09, 2012, 19:52

Yes, I uploaded them somewhat over two years ago and this was the first time I heard about what happened to them.  Maybe the cleaning crew found them under a desk. 

lol no wonder BS is performing so poorly, I really don't care about them and the seven word description is such a stupid requirement.

Title: Re: Finalist: Laziest Rejection Ever from BS "Approvers"
Post by: Wim on May 10, 2012, 01:44

Quote from: grp_photo on May 10, 2012, 01:04

the seven word description is such a stupid requirement.

Indeed!
Those with the bridge don't have to worry about that, which is silly really.

Title: Re: Finalist: Laziest Rejection Ever from BS "Approvers"
Post by: wut on May 10, 2012, 08:17

Quote from: grp_photo on May 10, 2012, 01:04

Quote from: louoates on May 09, 2012, 19:52

Yes, I uploaded them somewhat over two years ago and this was the first time I heard about what happened to them.  Maybe the cleaning crew found them under a desk. 

lol no wonder BS is performing so poorly, I really don't care about them and the seven word description is such a stupid requirement.

It's a pathetic little site. But which isn't out of the big for? A couple, at best, for most contributors. I can now see I made the right decision to not bother with the agencies out of the big 4, but I still had to deal with rude bas-tards at Zoonar when I wanted to delete my port, because I didn't get a single sales in 5 months...No sales, unprofessional behaviour, makes them unworthy of my time and attention (it may sound cocky, but it's the truth and you know it;)

Title: Re: Finalist: Laziest Rejection Ever from BS "Approvers"
Post by: jm on May 10, 2012, 08:22

It seems that images from digital cameras become darker and blurry after two years. No technology is perfect  :D