MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Finalist: Laziest Rejection Ever from BS "Approvers"  (Read 2210 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: May 09, 2012, 16:38 »
0
Here is the first of three rejections I just got today from BS:

Lou OATES,

Sorry, but an image you submitted was not approved at Bigstock :

Photo Name:   Balloons_3d
Photo ID:     1414205
Your User ID:
Approvers Comments:

Quality Control: FOCUS ISSUE
Quality Control: EXPOSURE ISSUE


Thank you,

Bigstock Approvers


The three that were rejected today were submitted OVER TWO YEARS AGO.
And, yes, indeed, all three were accepted back then at the other sites.

And when did the "inspectors" become "approvers"?


ShadySue

« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2012, 18:35 »
0
Do you mean you submitted the image two years ago and that's you just getting feedback on the submission?

« Reply #2 on: May 09, 2012, 19:52 »
0
Yes, I uploaded them somewhat over two years ago and this was the first time I heard about what happened to them.  Maybe the cleaning crew found them under a desk. 

grp_photo

« Reply #3 on: May 10, 2012, 01:04 »
0
Yes, I uploaded them somewhat over two years ago and this was the first time I heard about what happened to them.  Maybe the cleaning crew found them under a desk. 
lol no wonder BS is performing so poorly, I really don't care about them and the seven word description is such a stupid requirement.

Wim

« Reply #4 on: May 10, 2012, 01:44 »
0
the seven word description is such a stupid requirement.

Indeed!
Those with the bridge don't have to worry about that, which is silly really.

wut

« Reply #5 on: May 10, 2012, 08:17 »
0
Yes, I uploaded them somewhat over two years ago and this was the first time I heard about what happened to them.  Maybe the cleaning crew found them under a desk. 
lol no wonder BS is performing so poorly, I really don't care about them and the seven word description is such a stupid requirement.

It's a pathetic little site. But which isn't out of the big for? A couple, at best, for most contributors. I can now see I made the right decision to not bother with the agencies out of the big 4, but I still had to deal with rude bas-tards at Zoonar when I wanted to delete my port, because I didn't get a single sales in 5 months...No sales, unprofessional behaviour, makes them unworthy of my time and attention (it may sound cocky, but it's the truth and you know it;)

« Reply #6 on: May 10, 2012, 08:22 »
0
It seems that images from digital cameras become darker and blurry after two years. No technology is perfect  :D


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
19 Replies
9809 Views
Last post May 02, 2008, 07:24
by Dreamframer
9 Replies
5639 Views
Last post March 22, 2011, 13:12
by donding
21 Replies
4543 Views
Last post August 27, 2013, 22:10
by Uncle Pete
6 Replies
1755 Views
Last post May 14, 2015, 04:59
by Hobostocker
2 Replies
2185 Views
Last post December 19, 2015, 07:47
by max headroom

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results