MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Reviewers are a joke  (Read 4823 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Slovenian

« on: November 04, 2011, 04:00 »
0
" Reason:     severe vignetting..sorry..."

Yeah, added vignette to a couple of images accepted everywhere you ff-ing muppet!  ::)


« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2011, 06:44 »
0
lol

don't be mad, be happy that you have the pics on other sites and go on. time is money. don't waste it on rejections on a few sites.

Paulo M. F. Pires

  • "No Gods No Masters"
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2011, 06:49 »
0
I support almost reasons given by reviewers. Just one almost kill me on a "sub agency": "Too amauter"   ;D

Already on other agencies and one or two sales ( no subs ). So why worry about it?

« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2011, 08:33 »
0
Just one almost kill me on a "sub agency": "Too amauter"   ;D
Not many (Americans) know how to spell "amateur" right. They are even too dumb to use a spell-checker.

Slovenian

« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2011, 09:31 »
0
lol

don't be mad, be happy that you have the pics on other sites and go on. time is money. don't waste it on rejections on a few sites.

Yeah especially on a site like this. But then again, I can't see getting such a rejection at any of the "serious" (established and big) sites :)


I support almost reasons given by reviewers. Just one almost kill me on a "sub agency": "Too amauter"   ;D

Already on other agencies and one or two sales ( no subs ). So why worry about it?

Lol, they'd almost kill me with such a rejection as well. That being said I'd rather get a real rejection reason like that, then the cover up named LCV or a random rejection the inspector clicks at the moment he sees a shitey photo ;) (or what he thinks is a lousy photo)

I won't worry about it, I'll focus more on the work I do. I wouldn't even bother with such sites, but since I didn't shoot a lot, I said to myself I might as well try and get an extra 20-30$ or so on a site like this every month

avava

« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2011, 22:20 »
0
lol

don't be mad, be happy that you have the pics on other sites and go on. time is money. don't waste it on rejections on a few sites.

Yeah especially on a site like this. But then again, I can't see getting such a rejection at any of the "serious" (established and big) sites :)


I support almost reasons given by reviewers. Just one almost kill me on a "sub agency": "Too amauter"   ;D

Already on other agencies and one or two sales ( no subs ). So why worry about it?

Lol, they'd almost kill me with such a rejection as well. That being said I'd rather get a real rejection reason like that, then the cover up named LCV or a random rejection the inspector clicks at the moment he sees a shitey photo ;) (or what he thinks is a lousy photo)

I won't worry about it, I'll focus more on the work I do. I wouldn't even bother with such sites, but since I didn't shoot a lot, I said to myself I might as well try and get an extra 20-30$ or so on a site like this every month

BS is nice to me.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2011, 10:30 by avava »

« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2011, 19:09 »
0
Just one almost kill me on a "sub agency": "Too amauter"   ;D
Not many (Americans) know how to spell "amateur" right. They are even too dumb to use a spell-checker.

I know how to spell immature and you fit that bill pretty well.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
11 Replies
3022 Views
Last post July 08, 2013, 10:53
by thepoeticimage
40 Replies
9848 Views
Last post December 17, 2013, 05:37
by dpimborough
25 Replies
17621 Views
Last post April 04, 2015, 16:03
by stuttershock
38 Replies
12468 Views
Last post June 27, 2018, 11:14
by madman
212 Replies
34107 Views
Last post December 20, 2019, 10:08
by Snow

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors

3100 Posing Cards Bundle