Author Topic: Is the Canon EOS 1000D up to scratch? (Read 6856 times)

Will Dutt · « **on:** July 30, 2011, 20:17 »

Hi All,

I recently read an article from Microstock Insider which mentioned that agencies will turn your photos down technical quality of the camera is not up to scratch.

I currently only have a tiny budget and I was wondering if the Canon EOS 1000D is up to the technical quality that microstock agencies are looking for? I will also be purchasing an 18 - 55mm Lens and a Tripod.

Thanks in advance
Will Dutt

traveler1116 · « **Reply #1 on:** July 30, 2011, 20:26 »

Getty has a list of required cameras, the microstock sites don't. Your camera will be fine although your lens choice could be better. I would go with a 50mm, 100mm, or 24mm prime depending what you like to shoot instead of a cheap zoom.

Will Dutt · « **Reply #2 on:** July 30, 2011, 21:48 »

Quote from: traveler1116 on July 30, 2011, 20:26

Getty has a list of required cameras, the microstock sites don't. Your camera will be fine although your lens choice could be better. I would go with a 50mm, 100mm, or 24mm prime depending what you like to shoot instead of a cheap zoom.

Could you post a link to getty's required cameras? (Haven't been able to find it). Ill look into getting a better lens.

traveler1116 · « **Reply #3 on:** July 30, 2011, 22:52 »

http://contributors.gettyimages.com/workwithus/article.asp?article_id=1346

Looks like this link isn't fully up to date I think some leica point and shoot and sony models are added but it's not really important.

sharpshot · « **Reply #4 on:** July 31, 2011, 02:52 »

The 1000D is fine for microstock and alamy but it might not be a wise investment. I doubt Getty would turn you down if the photos were superb. You could also consider a second hand 550D. Some people have to have the latest model and I'm sure there's some good bargains on ebay. The shutter seems to last well, I think mine is already over its recommended limit, as I sometimes take thousands of photos doing timelapses. The 18mp sensor is great for stock, you can make more for the larger size on some sites and it allows you to crop or downsize. It also has 1080p video with manual controls, that will pay for my camera eventually.

Will Dutt · « **Reply #5 on:** July 31, 2011, 03:22 »

Quote from: sharpshot on July 31, 2011, 02:52

The 1000D is fine for microstock and alamy but it might not be a wise investment.

Well microstock will be my main target, I can always take a crack at Getty if the images are exceptional. I understand that Canon EOS1000D isn't the best but I dont want to blow more than $600 on a camera and will most likely buy a new better one in two years once I have graduated.

Druid · « **Reply #6 on:** July 31, 2011, 04:04 »

If you are already planning on upgrading from the 1000d then it would maybe be more sensible to wait until you have the money to buy a 550d or similar. The 1000d is an adequate if very basic camera, you will get more use out of the 550d or you could consider the Nikon d3100 or d5100 both very good cameras, if you want to be a bit different theres always the Sony A55 it depends in the end how much you want to spend.

I always think buying cheap with the intention of upgrading isn't very sensible financially.

Druid

lthn · « **Reply #7 on:** July 31, 2011, 06:32 »

Quote from: Will Dutt on July 31, 2011, 03:22

Quote from: sharpshot on July 31, 2011, 02:52
The 1000D is fine for microstock and alamy but it might not be a wise investment.
Well microstock will be my main target, I can always take a crack at Getty if the images are exceptional. I understand that Canon EOS1000D isn't the best but I dont want to blow more than $600 on a camera and will most likely buy a new better one in two years once I have graduated.

dude, wipe the exif, and thats it. : )

Will Dutt · « **Reply #8 on:** August 01, 2011, 02:23 »

Quote from: lthn on July 31, 2011, 06:32

dude, wipe the exif, and thats it. : )

Sorry, in noob language that means?

TheSmilingAssassin · « **Reply #9 on:** August 01, 2011, 09:50 »

Quote from: Will Dutt on August 01, 2011, 02:23

Quote from: lthn on July 31, 2011, 06:32
dude, wipe the exif, and thats it. : )
Sorry, in noob language that means?

Will, when you take a photo, there's data that is attached to that image called "EXIF" data. It lists the details of the image including things like resolution, date, the camera etc. lthn is telling you to remove the exif data so that the reviewers won't know what camera you used but... they'll know it was a crappy one.

The resolution is too low on the 1000D... 11MP I think from memory. I'd go the 550D or higher.

If you got a moment, pop into Michaels camera store in the CBD... they're awesome there and they'll give you some good advice. Not sure but they may even have a secondhand one or might be able to point you towards a good place to get a second hand one. They're on the corner of Lonsdale and Elizabeth. Maybe give them a buzz first and tell them your situation.

If you're on a low budget it might be tempting to go for a secondhand one through eBay but if you end up with a dudd, you'll be stuffed.

Cheers

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: Is the Canon EOS 1000D up to scratch? (Read 6856 times)

Will Dutt

traveler1116

Will Dutt

traveler1116

sharpshot

Will Dutt

Druid

lthn

Will Dutt

TheSmilingAssassin

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors