MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Did canstock just went all hardcore?  (Read 4715 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: January 06, 2012, 00:41 »
+1
Never used to get any rejection and just last 3 days I have gotten 20/22 photos rejected for reason of "photo not unique" enough or "not up to our standard"... I can pick many more photos that are way below standards of the ones I submitted in last 2 days that's been accepted without any issue...


« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2012, 00:59 »
0
At a time should begin to be more selective... maybe your pictures reached a hardcore reviewer.

santosa laksana

  • White Flower.88.
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2012, 02:36 »
0
Never used to get any rejection and just last 3 days I have gotten 20/22 photos rejected for reason of "photo not unique" enough or "not up to our standard"... I can pick many more photos that are way below standards of the ones I submitted in last 2 days that's been accepted without any issue...


I'm sure if you keep trying to improve the outcome of rejection, surely canstock parties will easily accept the results of your photo.
I have always received helpful suggestions about improvements to be made. Canstock parties will continue to help. Thank you Canstock.

« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2013, 07:48 »
0
Yes, they have! They now reject my images of Industrial machinery and public transportation, and those have been accepted everywhere else.

« Reply #4 on: March 13, 2013, 07:55 »
0
And almost null, zero, nada sells with 1000 + portfolio. Same portfolio on SS ulalaa.... happy happy :)

« Reply #5 on: March 13, 2013, 09:11 »
+1
which is why I took my port down.
To not have the fishpond poluted with links to an agency that could not perform.

« Reply #6 on: March 14, 2013, 14:48 »
0
After a big dip for a few months they are beginning to better for me - but getting more rejections - never mind if accepted pics are selling  :)

« Reply #7 on: March 14, 2013, 20:45 »
0
I had a batch of 19 rejected as well, mostly for "File appears to be too soft and/or out of focus, or may have an overly
shallow depth of field."  DP took all the same images, the other agencies took a selection.

I'm not concerned, this batch has subjects that have been done to death, and I've yet to make a single sale on Canstockphoto (with teeny tiny port, but same teeny tiny port is doing ok elsewhere) anyway, but I did think it was amusing.

Edited: Just checked, was only 16 of 19 rejected, not all 19!  Still a Canstockphoto record for me.

Poncke

« Reply #8 on: March 15, 2013, 02:10 »
0

« Reply #9 on: March 15, 2013, 07:23 »
0
It would be nice if Duncan couple pop in here to provide clarity and guidelines to their new inspection criteria, if indeed there has been an inspection  policy shift. Why just start doing it and not inform their contributors?<that was a joke, of course.

« Reply #10 on: March 24, 2013, 23:38 »
0
I think canstock needs to look at how it accepts the photos. 5 images per day is not working for me and i am sure, nor for others.  It must accept the uploads and process them as it wishes. 

--- PRO

« Reply #11 on: March 26, 2013, 08:53 »
0
Yeah, they rejected an image which was accepted even by SS and Dreamstime. DREAMSTIME! The masters of rejections!

tab62

« Reply #12 on: March 26, 2013, 09:20 »
0
As companies inventories get larger they will be come more selective. Most photos is the only one that I know that will take anything. Do we all companies to be like most photos? I don't.  Fotolia is harsh on flowers and outdoors shots due to the amount in their existing inventory so why shouldn't CanStockPhoto be? This market is becoming mature and the standards have risen compared to a just a few years ago...

Poncke

« Reply #13 on: March 26, 2013, 12:21 »
-1
As companies inventories get larger they will be come more selective. Most photos is the only one that I know that will take anything. Do we all companies to be like most photos? I don't.  Fotolia is harsh on flowers and outdoors shots due to the amount in their existing inventory so why shouldn't CanStockPhoto be? This market is becoming mature and the standards have risen compared to a just a few years ago...
because they still accept inferior stuff. Rejections are hard to take if your shots, which are 100x better, are rejected and crapstock is accepted.

Incompetent reviewers, they are called Atilla at SS, so why cant CanStockPhoto have a few of them?

« Reply #14 on: March 27, 2013, 03:51 »
0
  DP took all the same images, the other agencies took a selection.


DP take anything.  I've never had an image rejected there.

« Reply #15 on: March 27, 2013, 21:49 »
0
  DP took all the same images, the other agencies took a selection.

DP take anything.  I've never had an image rejected there.

I'm sure someone said that about Canstockphotos once too ;)  DP have rejected some of mine. but for the most part those are images I know aren't perfect.  They have been accepted and sold on other sites so I always throw them in the see if they stick, but I won't argue the rejection.

Not that it matters, Canstock and DP are the only two agencies where I've yet to have a single sale.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
12 Replies
5837 Views
Last post May 16, 2006, 21:49
by phildate
bye bye Canstock

Started by Greg Boiarsky CanStockPhoto.com

19 Replies
10237 Views
Last post November 11, 2007, 15:37
by Velvia
6 Replies
6047 Views
Last post May 09, 2007, 17:17
by jlye
17 Replies
7919 Views
Last post September 09, 2007, 16:59
by takestock
28 Replies
17938 Views
Last post February 27, 2010, 16:55
by vonkara

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors

3100 Posing Cards Bundle