Author Topic: File does not appear to be professional in composition. (Read 4772 times)

Semmick Photo · « **on:** March 10, 2015, 18:30 »

Whats is " professional composition " ?

Jo Ann Snover · « **Reply #1 on:** March 10, 2015, 18:40 »

You are trying to make sense of the inherently subjective and often randomly applied rules of each agency reviewer. Good luck with that!

I'm sure rule of thirds and golden mean will figure in an answer, but the bottom line is they didn't like the composition and to make it sound less arbitrary, they classified what they don't like as unprofessional

PaulieWalnuts · « **Reply #2 on:** March 10, 2015, 18:50 »

I would tell them that your professional composition is reserved for professional level prices which they don't offer.

Semmick Photo · « **Reply #3 on:** March 10, 2015, 19:13 »

Haha, good ones.

Its a daring composition for sure. I guess it only works on human faces.

Beppe Grillo · « **Reply #4 on:** March 11, 2015, 03:08 »

Quote from: Semmick Photo on March 10, 2015, 19:13

Haha, good ones.

Its a daring composition for sure. I guess it only works on human faces.

Duplicating it, flipping it and assembling the two parts together you will get an extra-professional composition…

Semmick Photo · « **Reply #5 on:** March 11, 2015, 03:57 »

ShadySue · « **Reply #6 on:** March 11, 2015, 06:28 »

cascoly · « **Reply #7 on:** March 11, 2015, 13:47 »

Quote from: Semmick Photo on March 10, 2015, 19:13

Haha, good ones.

Its a daring composition for sure. I guess it only works on human faces.

agreed -- pretty much anytime a subject is cropped you'll get ding'd for poor composition

reviewers seem to think that buyers must be offered a chance to crop an image themselves, while ignoring the fact that an arresting image might attract more buyers; this shouldn't be a decision made by reviewers -- they should be looking at technical issues only