MicrostockGroup

Agency Based Discussion => CanStockPhoto.com => Topic started by: Carl on November 08, 2011, 18:57

Title: Funny Rejection at CanStockPhoto
Post by: Carl on November 08, 2011, 18:57

This one is just so amusing that I had to share it.  I just had a silhouette rejected at CanStockPhoto because it "appears to be underexposed."  It even has the word "silhouette" in the title, in the description, and in the keywords.  Underexposed.  Duh!  Ya think???

(http://s.thumbs.canstockphoto.com/canstock7784149.jpg)

Title: Re: Funny Rejection at CanStockPhoto
Post by: m@m on November 08, 2011, 19:42

Sounds to me as a nice way of saying "We don't want that silhouette"... ;)

Title: Re: Funny Rejection at CanStockPhoto
Post by: CD123 on November 08, 2011, 23:38

csproductions rejections are so few there, maybe we can allow them one miss-click every 3 months or so  ;D

Have you considered that you might have used a greyish color rather than a black...?  ;)

Title: Re: Funny Rejection at CanStockPhoto
Post by: nicku on November 09, 2011, 01:08

Quote from: csproductions on November 08, 2011, 18:57

This one is just so amusing that I had to share it.  I just had a silhouette rejected at CanStockPhoto because it "appears to be underexposed."  It even has the word "silhouette" in the title, in the description, and in the keywords.  Underexposed.  Duh!  Ya think???

([url]http://s.thumbs.canstockphoto.com/canstock7784149.jpg[/url])

I believe this was a mistake in the review process...

I have a APPROVED photo on SS representing a stone background, and the title and keywords say abstract wood texture ( a mistake made by me).... after i discovered the error i changed the title and keys....

What i trying to say is that reviewers make mistakes in both ways;

Title: Re: Funny Rejection at CanStockPhoto
Post by: traveler1116 on November 09, 2011, 01:58

Looks kinda small.