Author Topic: Funny Rejection at CanStockPhoto (Read 3085 times)

Carl · « **on:** November 08, 2011, 18:57 »

This one is just so amusing that I had to share it. I just had a silhouette rejected at CanStockPhoto because it "appears to be underexposed." It even has the word "silhouette" in the title, in the description, and in the keywords. Underexposed. Duh! Ya think???

m@m · « **Reply #1 on:** November 08, 2011, 19:42 »

Sounds to me as a nice way of saying "We don't want that silhouette"...

CD123 · « **Reply #2 on:** November 08, 2011, 23:38 »

csproductions rejections are so few there, maybe we can allow them one miss-click every 3 months or so

Have you considered that you might have used a greyish color rather than a black...?

nicku · « **Reply #3 on:** November 09, 2011, 01:08 »

Quote from: csproductions on November 08, 2011, 18:57

This one is just so amusing that I had to share it. I just had a silhouette rejected at CanStockPhoto because it "appears to be underexposed." It even has the word "silhouette" in the title, in the description, and in the keywords. Underexposed. Duh! Ya think???

I believe this was a mistake in the review process...

I have a APPROVED photo on SS representing a stone background, and the title and keywords say abstract wood texture ( a mistake made by me).... after i discovered the error i changed the title and keys....

What i trying to say is that reviewers make mistakes in both ways;

traveler1116 · « **Reply #4 on:** November 09, 2011, 01:58 »

Looks kinda small.

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: Funny Rejection at CanStockPhoto (Read 3085 times)

Carl

m@m

CD123

nicku

traveler1116

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors