MicrostockGroup
Agency Based Discussion => CanStockPhoto.com => Topic started by: MadPhotos on March 15, 2019, 12:00
-
Just gave a try for a last time to try on Canstockphoto and thats what happend :
"Content containing nudity requires model releases with government photo identification. This identification must contain the model's date of birth. File is not unique enough for acceptance."
And thats the photo: (https://image.shutterstock.com/z/stock-photo-dog-on-a-sofa-in-funny-pose-beagle-tired-sleeping-on-couch-paws-upwards-on-back-yawning-with-long-1330478384.jpg)
My acceptance here is 1% And other five agencies that i have my portofolio on is between 90-100%
Feels like reviewers are just bots.
-
:o LOL
-
Maybe they use AI and it thought that was a body part of a person.
LOL. 😄
-
Now you have to dress the dog. LOL
-
Don't see your problem the dog is clearly stark naked not even a collar....shocking
-
Sexxxxxxy. Lol.
-
:o :o :o
-
I think it was an AI/algorithm that flagged it.
Looking at it through a "computer's" perspective - the dog's tooth that happens to be right beside a 'pink' tongue from a 'computers' perspective looks like a nipple on a breast.
I.e.,
-
I think it was an AI/algorithm that flagged it.
Looking at it through a "computer's" perspective - the dog's tooth that happens to be right beside a 'pink' tongue from a 'computers' perspective looks like a nipple on a breast.
I.e.,
Simpler to say that AI is stupid a cheap dumb piece of software that is obviously not fit for purpose.
Only in the wildest of dreams would that ever be construed as a nipple.
-
Only in the wildest of dreams would that ever be construed as a nipple.
Well, part of the dog's ear can be assumed as an identifiable part of the body assuming that
there are no dirty images only dirty minds as they phrase says or....
....or that there is a bad sampling of partial human parts for the AI to compare! :D :P
-
Just gave a try for a last time to try on Canstockphoto
That should make things clear.
-
Just gave a try for a last time to try on Canstockphoto
That should make things clear.
Haha
Beautiful
-
And the dog is probably even underage! Is that why you didn't supply the model's date of birth, you perv?