Author Topic: News - Offensive & Politically Incorrect Advertising & Propaganda (Read 5391 times)

News Feed · « **on:** March 26, 2009, 13:00 »

Offensive & Politically Incorrect Advertising & Propaganda

Glaring racism, violence, murder, misogynism and a lot of smoke - In this post, we have a look at various forms of "politically incorrect" advertising and propaganda from the late 1800's up until the present. The material of our present days might not be as overt as it used to, but it's still about in droves, and sometimes with an even fouler smell to it.

http://www.crestock.com/blog/design/offensive-politically-incorrect-advertising-propaganda-170.aspx

Milinz · « **Reply #1 on:** March 26, 2009, 17:09 »

Quote from: News Feed on March 26, 2009, 13:00

Offensive & Politically Incorrect Advertising & Propaganda

Glaring racism, violence, murder, misogynism and a lot of smoke - In this post, we have a look at various forms of "politically incorrect" advertising and propaganda from the late 1800's up until the present. The material of our present days might not be as overt as it used to, but it's still about in droves, and sometimes with an even fouler smell to it.

http://www.crestock.com/blog/design/offensive-politically-incorrect-advertising-propaganda-170.aspx

Sorry dude, but my expirience and knowledge of marketing/advertising is that propaganda is NEVER POLITICALLY CORRECT so this is absurd to call it as you did. You may talk abot some passed times when that was usual and so on until someone made law about no smoke in advertising and so on...

snaprender · « **Reply #2 on:** March 27, 2009, 10:20 »

I can't help but find the irony in this ... Here Crestock shows offensive and degrading advertisements......and yet there is 'Judge Ross' on the side bar publically degrading their very own contributors photos in the 'worst image of the day' - which if it's your photo - you might just find offensive.

Snaprender

tan510jomast · « **Reply #3 on:** March 27, 2009, 11:07 »

Quote from: snaprender on March 27, 2009, 10:20

I can't help but find the irony in this ... Here Crestock shows offensive and degrading advertisements......and yet there is 'Judge Ross' on the side bar publically degrading their very own contributors photos in the 'worst image of the day' - which if it's your photo - you might just find offensive.

Snaprender

good point. i am not with Crestock, but maybe they should change the title to something less destructive
and more positive "win win" . like instead of a "this is crap", do something that offers help to a "bad stock photograph". this way , those whose images are rejected for the same reasons will learn what elements to avoid . this in turn would benefit the contributors , and Crestock, as the approval rate increases . win win situation. Take off Judge's wig , break his hammer, and get Ross to put on an ombudsman's overall.
wouldn't it be nicer and friendlier ?

snaprender · « **Reply #4 on:** March 27, 2009, 11:15 »

Quote from: tan510jomast on March 27, 2009, 11:07

Quote from: snaprender on March 27, 2009, 10:20
I can't help but find the irony in this ... Here Crestock shows offensive and degrading advertisements......and yet there is 'Judge Ross' on the side bar publically degrading their very own contributors photos in the 'worst image of the day' - which if it's your photo - you might just find offensive.

Snaprender

good point. i am not with Crestock, but maybe they should change the title to something less destructive
and more positive "win win" . like instead of a "this is crap", do something that offers help to a "bad stock photograph". this way , those whose images are rejected for the same reasons will learn what elements to avoid . this in turn would benefit the contributors , and Crestock, as the approval rate increases . win win situation. Take off Judge's wig , break his hammer, and get Ross to put on an ombudsman's overall.
wouldn't it be nicer and friendlier ?

I totally agree. I have never seen the point on ole' Judge Ross.

tan510jomast · « **Reply #5 on:** March 27, 2009, 11:19 »

Quote from: snaprender on March 27, 2009, 11:15

I totally agree. I have never seen the point on ole' Judge Ross.

i don't know anyone who would. not unless they are into S&M

null · « **Reply #6 on:** March 27, 2009, 12:10 »

Quote from: snaprender on March 27, 2009, 11:15

I totally agree. I have never seen the point on ole' Judge Ross.

She is married to Attila the reviewer and brings out all his dirty secrets.

Milinz · « **Reply #7 on:** March 27, 2009, 13:50 »

Lol!

Sorry for my not recognizing irony in your words dude... If that was quote from Crestock it doesn't surprise me at all...

They always tend to invent hot water as well as they try to do it with ice ;-)

Other words: They are judging by some 'super inteligent' kind of mind streams known only to them...

Let them sink as they are sinking...

And, of course abandon the ship!