My editorial do best with SS, then DT.   Twenty20 (20twenty?) has also sold a few.  Not as many, but the return seems to be always be $2 per sale, which bits the less than a $ return on DT and SS subs. 

On SS far more editorial then on DT for me.

For me maybe once but DT gets worse and in this area SS is getting relatively better. I tend to sell stuff that doesn't much/at all elsewhere on DT quite a bit...but recently it seems to have died.

I commented on another thread that my sales have plummeted in the past couple of months, as seems to be the case for many other contributors (just go to the DT forums to see), so I guess that's what OP calls "DT bashing." For the record, I think in theory, DT is a great agency.

If you don't value your work, nobody else will, and that's the reason why, a couple of years ago, when I decided to give microstock a shot, I signed up as an exclusive with DT: to my knowledge, no other agency pays its contributors 60 percent, which seemed to me more than fair. (Getting paid 20 percent so that a billionaire can buy himself another helicopter doesn't.) That says to me that DT is an agency that values and respects its contributors, which made me want to work with them. My opinion of DT in that respect hasn't changed.

Unfortunately, for some reason, sales on DT are just low and 60 percent of almost nothing is still almost nothing. And the latest change that DT made benefits older photos, which harms relatively new contributors such as me.

As I said, I think in theory DT is a great agency for exclusive contributors. The problem is that you cannot pay your bills in theory (I've tried). I do find it unfortunate that an agency that treats exclusive contributors as well as DT does is not more successful. I wish everybody in microstock would contribute exclusively to DT so that it would become the leading agency and all of us would get paid really well but, sadly, that's not happening.